Posted on 01/30/2016 7:12:48 AM PST by bray
Romans 8:24 For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?
What if everything we know about science is wrong? What if science has been completely corrupted by agenda driven politics and what we have left is more political than scientific? What if science is simply a tool to manipulate?
Science for the past hundred years has been more wrong than right. What we have seen is the foundation of science is corrupt and built on a lie so science has repeated this model over and over to promote their agenda. Science has wasted hundreds of billions of dollars molding their version of the truth in their need to control as many people as possible.
Science has become a cult like religion for numerous fallacies throughout this country to cripple capitalism and promote socialism. Some of their more recent fallacies are lead in gas causes brain damage which was later disproved. It was universally accepted as settled science by the scientific community so a crisis was declared. This one brought us all sorts of additional regulations, regs and poorer performing gas.
We then had every so called extinction fallacy under the sun which was used to destroy farming and ranching on private and public lands. They see or fake a lowering of species numbers and then through gummit or lawsuits they declare them endangered to close that land to usage. The same goes with waterways, oceans and rivers. In the Northwest fifty years ago they declared seals endangered and now they are a nuisance and nobody can control them. It is settled science so the seals are able to destroy the salmon and sturgeon runs without any way to control them thanks to agenda driven science. Since they are cute science allows them to destroy the salmon.
This is multiplied when you come to political science. Ever since Karl Marx the evolutionists wanted to have a superior political and economic system so they believed socialism was the next evolution. They sold it as a more evolved government and economic system which is blended for the modern world. They believed they were the only ones intelligent enough to divide the resources and assets equally to care of the common man and poor. They believed in this manmade utopia which was the equivalent of a societal heaven. This is what they have been chasing for the past hundred years which is the scientific version of economics.
Just like evolution there is absolutely no proof this system works. Everywhere it is tried and instituted through tyranny the people starve or killing fields exist. To institute this system correctly you have to have dictators such as Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Castro, etc and kill all the free thinking capitalists who you label as dissenters or enemies. The problem is those capitalists are the ones who make the economy work and so you run out of people who are creative and hard working leaving the less ambitious slowing the economic engine.
Some will point to Europe as an economic success even though there has been economic stagnation for fifty years. The capitalists have been run out and up until a few years ago their new business success rate was a fraction of the American rate which is slowing to their levels. The only thing that is somewhat keeping Europe alive is that there are still pockets of capitalism in the socialist morass to feed the overbearing social systems that is filled with corruption and waste. To live in Europe is a life knowing you are not going to advance in whatever job you have and if you do you will be taxed into poverty.
The main problem with Marxism is nobody wants to work for free. The entire premise of the system is that people are willing to sacrifice and work without receiving any compensation or extra reward. This is a ridiculous concept since everyone wants and needs to improve their lives and the lives of the children, it is a basic instinct. If people are not willing to work or provide services for free then there is no way to make the engine run and you end up with unmotivated people not adding to the storehouse and actually taking from that storehouse which is also a natural instinct.
Without rewards people will not work it is as simple as that. The more we take away rewards or punish success the fewer people we have working to help themselves. The fewer people we have working for themselves or their companies the more we have taking from the storehouses and less added. This is a formula for disaster yet science continues to cling to this failed theory just like they have evolution calling it settled science. Science has declared capitalism unjust due to its inequality by their definition so they have settled on the equality of mutual suffering through Marxism and nobody dare challenge that for fear of retribution.
We now have two parties embracing Marxism on two different levels. One Party believes we do not have enough Socialism and the other believes you have to manage it properly. There is no Party willing to challenge it or tell the people there is another way for fear of being called an evil racist, sexist, homophobe. This is where evolution has taken us with its twin sister Marxism. They have both become so ingrained to the common thought process of America there is no way to break ourselves free or even challenge it.
The first step of this process is to begin questioning science. What if everything they are telling us is wrong and is all agenda driven? What if what we know about where we came from and where we are going is false and we need to actually question the results and retest to see if they are valid. We need new scientists who are not afraid to worship God and admire his creation. We need people skeptical of every corner of science and if they hold up to testing then they have credibility, but if they do not they need to be discarded and then focus on theories which do hold up.
The first places to look are of course evolution which after 150 years if it does not stand up it is time for new thought. We also need a hard look at the ugly family of Global Warming and his brother Marxism. One is simply a tool to accelerate the other. Neither one of them are valid and people have to be ready to take the pain and suffering of a hundred years of Socialist rebuilding. If God exists then manmade scientific economic models are chasing after smoke. We have to celebrate his wonder and count on individual freedom and expression to create the world he gave us.
This is a world built on the faith of your fellow man making his world better which will improve yours. It is a world where poverty is actually solved through the churches and charities rather than by gummit fiat. It is a world where you trust your brother to make things better and to actually become stewards of this great earth rather than gummit owned and stoned. This is a brave new world being explored by brave new people ready to explore the limits of mankind rather than limited. What if science is wrong and God is real?
Pray America wakes
PS My book explains what this world would look like.
Enough braying
The only “capitalism” in Europe is of Lenin’s “state capitalism” model.
Denouncing science is a stupid place to start a political screed.
Especially since it was the Marxists that attempted and continue to attempt to steal the banner of science (i.e. real science, from the religious who believe in and look to God) and apply it to their pseudoscientific quackery.
Excellent...akin to the definition of cultural Marxism.
“Cultural Marxism” is a redundant term since Marxism is an attack on culture by definition.
Marxism has been a very costly set of errors.
When has Marx ever been RIGHT???
Actually, it’s pseudoscience that is being politicized. Since real science gives data that is not politically correct, they don’t want aught to do with it.
Marxists always end up resorting to murder, intimidation or mass incarceration to impose their mandates. Mao and Stalin killed probably near one hundred million which the new left never mentions. Marxists consider it to be justified by the nobility of their intentions.
If? IF?
That cretin did a pretty good job of being wrong about everything.
“Science for the past hundred years has been more wrong than right.” And so on, repeated & paraphrased for several paragraphs. Yes, I get he’s about the politicization but that must be made properly clear.
You lost me as soon as you started talking about leaded gasoline. First, lead wasn’t taken out of gasoline to reduce lead exposure, it was taken out because the chemical additive fouls catalytic converters that clean the unburnt by products of combustion. As a person who hates driving behind old, pre-catalytic cars because they all stink I am glad of it. The relatively clean air around cities today compared to 40 years ago is at testament to the value of taking out lead and adding catalysts.
The reduction of environmental lead was a happy by-product of that change which has had it own beneficial results. Lead is toxic to the nervous system. I work in a lead acid battery factory and we take lead exposure very seriously, monitoring every employee, even those of us us in the offices, regularly. In children the effects are pronounced at much lower levels than adults so as a parent I am very happy that particulate exhaust and road dust are not a source of lead for my children.
I stopped reading at that point. If you are going to bring up something tangential to your point, at least get your facts straight so you don’t ruin your credibility up front.
As opposed to our Founders who built a government designed to make the individual and his freedom as the center of the government. Hence, ''We the People.''
Sadly, people have forgotten our true American nature.
“Science” is now political; scientists spend much of their time recruiting public and private research grants. To get the grants, they must present liberal ideas that the American people have been led are true. In fact, such ideas are “unscientific”!!! I don’t think the American people will ever catch on the duplicity.
I have my facts straight, how about you?
I will accept your apology although I think you have other issues with this and you were just trying to shut me up.
Some popular liberal Americans in particularly have long admired Mao if not Stalin. They don’t know any better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.