Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First on CNN: North Korea may have tested components of a hydrogen bomb
CNN ^ | 01/28/2016 | Barbara Starr

Posted on 01/28/2016 1:32:39 PM PST by BenLurkin

The U.S. now believes North Korea might have attempted to test components of a hydrogen bomb on January 6, after further review and analysis of the latest intelligence information.

A U.S. official directly familiar with the latest U.S. assessment said there may have been a partial, failed test of some type of components associated with a hydrogen bomb.

The assessment comes after careful examination of the latest intelligence analysis of the test data. But the official emphasized there is no final conclusion.

...

That analysis shows the test was conducted more than two times deeper underground than originally assessed -- at a depth consistent with what might be needed for a hydrogen bomb.

However, the size of the seismic event and other intelligence indicates it was not likely a fully functioning device. The official said it's possible the North Koreans believe they conducted a full hydrogen bomb test, but the U.S. believes it was likely only some components, perhaps a detonator, that exploded.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: War on Terror
KEYWORDS: hbomb; hydrogenbomb; korea; northkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: kabar

N. Korea says its H-bomb ‘capable of wiping out whole US at once’
13 Jan, 2016 08:41
https://www.rt.com/news/328724-north-korea-bomb-us/

With one bomb?


21 posted on 01/28/2016 2:42:33 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Another fail for US intelligence...

I read the whole article and agree with your assessment. "Parts"? May be? WTF? When the first seismic accounts hit FR, even we determined that it was either a dud or well within the 'fake with a mountainfull of anfo' region. So we know as much (or more) as they're telling us. Only thing missing is the Benny Hill theme.
22 posted on 01/28/2016 2:50:41 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t have a hole in our south-facing radar?

Obama is not going to let a new POTUS be inaugurated. If it’s Trump he will expose the coup of 2008, and Obama’s owners can’t allow that. Obama will be in the southern hemisphere in November and December, and it’s looking like Iran and North Korea are on-schedule to be able to do the EMP attack that can start the Armageddon that Iran has promised - with the terror sleeper cells here in place to finish us off, just as Obama held the door open to them so they could do...

This needs to be the top priority for Trump and Cruz: we NEED to move our portable radar system into place to fill that hole in our radar defense. NOW!


23 posted on 01/28/2016 2:57:17 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Cnn is actually covering the news unlike Fox.

ISIS is running all over Libya and North Africa

Ash Carter got call off a trip immediately to go to the White House over ISIS's moves.

24 posted on 01/28/2016 3:23:16 PM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Ping


25 posted on 01/28/2016 3:25:05 PM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Vote Tom Hoefling of America's Party for President the only person to restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I can make an unsuccessful hydrogen bomb. I have several in my desk drawer....


26 posted on 01/28/2016 3:30:17 PM PST by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVERALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Mostly a hydrogen bomb uses an atomic bomb as a trigger, lithium as an accelerator/catalyst and deuterium as the fuel. The deuterium is the hard part.


27 posted on 01/28/2016 3:55:49 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PIF
Lets just say that having a Fusion weapon pretty much makes the enriching of uranium a moot issue.

Ever bit of Obama’s Iran deal was focused almost solely on Iran's uranium enrichment program which is not critical for a hydrogen bomb, while allowing Iran free access to the worlds dual use nuclear technology that is useful for development and production of hydrogen bombs.

Iran is North Korea's nuclear proliferation partner so if the North Koreans have a hydrogen bomb then so does Iran,

Obama gave Iran 150 Billion dollars to develop weapons, listed international economic and nuclear technology sanctions and embargos on Iran, agreed to use American Military to protect Iran's nuclear facilities from attack and explicitly agreed to provide Iran with with nuclear technology and know how that could be used by Iran and North Korea to refine their HYDROGEN Bomb technology which essentially makes their uranium bomb technology obsolete all in return for restrictions on Iran's ability to the produced highly enriched weapons grade uranium need to make a uranium fission bomb.

Obama and Kerry did explicitly agree to allow Iran to produce the kind of lower level enriched uranium needed to make plutonium for the production of a hydrogen bomb.

Obama and Kerry also explicitly agreed to allow Iran complete freedom to lift sanctions and embargoes on Iran's ability develop or freely purchase on the world market ballistic missile technology and even complete ballistic missiles from any country willing to sell i to them.

Obama said did not care if Iran had ballistic missiles because his historic Iran Nuclear Deal would prevent Iran from getting uranium to make uranium bombs to load on the missies.

Obama was 100% correct on this. There is no way in hell Iran would ever put a uranium bomb on ballistic missile when they could put a Hydrogen Bomb on instead.

My big concern on Obama’s Iran deal was that it seemed to completely ignore Iran's ability to build or field a hydrogen bomb and even facilitated Iran's development of a Hydrogen bomb.

Now Iran has working Hydrogen Bomb technology, 150 Billion to develop or buy a bomb, express permission buy pretty much any nuclear technology used for Hydrogen bombs but not related to uranium enrichment or production of uranium bombs and full freedom to develop or buy ballistic missile technology and parts of the world market

Obama gave all that to ran in return for nothing, not even Iran's promise to stop threatening to destroy America

28 posted on 01/28/2016 4:19:46 PM PST by rdcbn ("If what has happened here is not treason, it is its first cousin." Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Funny.


29 posted on 01/28/2016 4:20:28 PM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Quite possible. As I recall from college physics, the energy required to initiate fusion in a thermonuclear device is generally through the use of a fission “bomb.”

That would explain the “smallish” explosion detected.

Mark


30 posted on 01/28/2016 5:13:53 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
ISIS is running all over Libya and North Africa

Nothing to see here, move along. After all, ISIS is the "JV" team, and they're no "existential threat" to the United States.

Barky promised that we have nothing to worry about.

Mark

31 posted on 01/28/2016 5:22:08 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: the_individual2014

32 posted on 01/28/2016 8:53:49 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: the_individual2014

I saw a special on that bomb. It said the scientist made it a little smaller than was originally intended. I forget if it was because he figured that the effect of making it larger would be minimal or that would be too dangerous. Everybody thanks for all the great answers. If the explosive power of a hydrogen bomb is theoretically infinite then a planet killer could be made no?


33 posted on 01/28/2016 10:21:59 PM PST by dp0622
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t have a hole in our south-facing radar?

According to who?

Some blog?

34 posted on 01/29/2016 4:26:30 AM PST by humblegunner (NOW with even more AWESOMENESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

The experts have been saying this since the mid-70’s. The reason to not do anything about it was always that our enemies either didn’t have a nuke to use or didn’t have a way to deliver it vie the southern hemisphere. Both of those things have changed under Obama. We did have balloons that were monitoring the skies to the south but Obama got rid of that because its primary purpose was to stop illegals and drug smuggling, and we know he considers it unconstitutional to actually have a border. At least that’s the fig-leaf answer for why he’s leaving the southern skies wide open, with no eyes watching there. Fact is, he’s done everything necessary to make sure our enemies have exactly what they need - right when they need it (at the end of his last term so there can be a catastrophic event preventing any new POTUS from being inaugurated and extending his time as CINC to the “8-10 years” he told us he’d be POTUS in July of 2008.

I posted a thread that had a bunch of links for sources but just googling could give you a bunch more.


35 posted on 01/29/2016 6:08:30 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson