Did you read my comment? It has no iota of support for or opposition to Donald Trump.
It decries the fact that the GOPe and NRO apparently have given up on persuasion and moved on into insulting coercion.
Much like your attempted shaming of me because I did not leap to the conclusion you prefer, instead noticing that I am being insulted by the article.
It was not my intent to insult. Please forgive me.
Now, do Trump's flip flops that are set out in the article have any relevance as to his fitness for high office?
I understand the anger against NRO. But, must that preclude actual discussion of an article with clearly stated and well argued points of objection?