[TontoKowalski]

A friend texted me that at the end of Kelly's show tonight, she was urging viewers to turn in for the debate, because they had some "really tough" questions planned for the candidates. Then she snickered, like "we're really going to get them!"

Of course I can't confirm this, because I don't watch her show. Didn't before, and I certainly won't now.

She's a lightweight journalist. It's the one thing I figured out before Trump did.

[mumblypeg]

“...lightweight journalist.”

Yep. Eye candy. T&A. Slept with Brit Hume to get her job.
Still, I wish Trump could learn to swat aside her “gotchas” and quickly pivot to the issues, instead of making Blondie herself the issue.

[Sgt_Schultze]

If that’s indeed the case, the remaining candidates should ally to refuse to answer questions designed to elicit conflict. They should acknowledge the question and then answer some other topic. If the mods complain that the question wasn’t answered, the candidates could reply that nobody at their events has expressed that opinion, or that the question was so nonsensical that they thought the questioner was joking. In the end, if none of the candidates cooperated with the theatrics, what would fox do?