“Accuracy must not be a part of FBI training if this is true.”
After listening to the whole tape, and assuming the accuracy of the witness’ perceptions, this makes sense.
The FBI and whatever else organization could easily have killed all of these people at any time once they stopped the vehicle. They could have been shot to bits like Bonnie and Clyde.
Most of these people were not shot because fedzilla did not want them dead. This was an example. This was an act of State terrorism. The laser targeting, the car shot to bits and shot all around the passengers was to drive home their vulnerability. At least one had to die to prove the government’s willingness and resolve to execute dissidents, but the others were intended to be terrorized. They will mostly be let free to carry the story home. This is meant to intimidate and suppress dissenters. This is much more subtle and strategic than the federal atrocities at Ruby Ridge and Waco.
That is how I read it, anyway. Willing to hear other theories which account for this bizarre sequence of events.
“That is how I read it, anyway. “
Very good points you mention. I had not thought of it that way.
Thats kinda how I see it. An example must be made.
There is no accounting for the shooting in an ultimate sense, because there’s no reason to bother these people. They were not harmful, had not harmed, and were committing the awful act of sleeping in a firefighter’s shack.
Why would the law confront them that night and shoot?
My guess is that they were looking for the tiniest provocation that they could hang their hats on, and that when finally pressed they’ll say they “thought X was doing this or that”.
That’s all they need.
They’ll walk, but we’ll continue knowing it was unnecessary.