Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk; All
Thank you for referencing that article Hojczyk. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"That’s different from his past positions on taxes, which include fighting the flat tax and proposing a wealth tax that would force owners to liquidate their property to pay taxes every year."

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponents Argument

Please note that Sen. Cruz, Chief Justice John Roberts, and Mr. Shaprio were all indoctrinated in Harvard Law School. This is evidenced by the observation that none of these constitutional ”experts” seem to be aware of the clarification by a previous generation of state sovereignty-activist justices that Congress is prohibited from appropriating taxes in the name of state power issues, essentially any issue that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers.

”Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” - Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.

Based on the Courts statement above, here is a rough approximation of how much property owners and other taxpayers should be paying Congress annually to perform its Section 8-limited power duties.

Given that the plurality of clauses in Section 8 deal with defense, and given that the Department of Defense budget for 2015 was $500+ billion, I will generously round up the $500+ billion figure to $1 trillion (but probably much less) as the annual price tag of the federal government to the taxpayers.

In other words, the corrupt media, including Obama guard dog Fx News, should not be reporting multi-trillion dollar annual federal budgets without mentioning the Supreme Courts clarification of Congresss limited power to appropriate taxes in budget discussions.

Remember in November!

When patriots elect Trump, or whatever conservative they elect, they need to also elect a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will work within its Section 8-limited powers to support the new president.

Also consider that such a Congress would probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.

54 posted on 01/24/2016 3:24:51 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

Agreed, whoever get’s the election, we should always push for states rights


56 posted on 01/24/2016 3:32:01 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson