Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nita Nupress

I know that if a liberal judge said that, it would be appealed to the Supreme Court, and the current make-up of the court would rule Cruz is eligible. That’s a guarantee.


64 posted on 01/24/2016 1:10:27 PM PST by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones
I know that if a liberal judge said that, it would be appealed to the Supreme Court, and the current make-up of the court would rule Cruz is eligible. That’s a guarantee.

If the SC refused to hear John McCain's case, what would compel them to hear the more complicated case of Ted Cruz? Please give a reasonable, believable reason why they wouldn't punt to Congress as they did with McCain.

65 posted on 01/24/2016 4:16:13 PM PST by Nita Nupress (RIP JRandomFreeper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: JediJones

If you feel like it, I’d love to have feedback from a cruz person on 71 and 72.


73 posted on 01/24/2016 5:30:44 PM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson