To: Elderberry
Obama is about to do a TON of humming and hawing
To: Elderberry
Interesting article but largely irrelevant since SCOTUS has become 100% partisan and 0% reflective of the law.
3 posted on
01/23/2016 10:56:00 AM PST by
rockrr
(Everything is different now...)
To: Elderberry
In other words, the executive branch cannot forbid the enforcement of the laws. Geeeeeeee, does that mean the existing immigration laws need to be enforced? Since Obama claims to be a constitutional scholar, you would think he knows that.
4 posted on
01/23/2016 10:57:29 AM PST by
Bernard
(The Road To Hell Is Not Paved With Good Results)
To: Elderberry
If the liberal Democrats were bank robbers, National Review would be holding open the door and driving the getaway car.
And they would expect us to praise them because they didn’t speed as they were driving away. :)
5 posted on
01/23/2016 11:08:38 AM PST by
Tzimisce
To: Elderberry
What laws?
We don't need no stinkin' laws!!!!!!
6 posted on
01/23/2016 11:09:05 AM PST by
eartick
(Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
To: Elderberry
If Scotus rules that presidents can selectively enforce or not enforce congressional law or pick and choose sections of laws to enforce or not enforce, then Scotus will be ending the Constitutional power of Congress.
There's no way around that conclusion that I can see.
"Citizens must be well informed and ready to pursue positive goals toward self-defense."
If I can pick and choose, I'll "enforce" that by only using the words, "Citizens must be...positive."
"Citizens must be well informed and read to pursue positive goals toward self-defense."
That's not a rewrite at all is it? /sarc
7 posted on
01/23/2016 11:09:49 AM PST by
xzins
(Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Elderberry
Took them long enough, not that anything is going to change.
9 posted on
01/23/2016 11:14:00 AM PST by
wastedyears
(uchikudake - toki michite - ikiru tame - tokihanate)
To: Elderberry
Hmm, if SCOTUS rules against Obama making law, will it then have to cancel it's own law making for homosexuals calling themselves married?
I'm thinking this will be one of those oral arguments that I'll absolutely have to listen to. Truthfully, if the administration doesn't bring up this particular example as foundational for Obama’s actions, they are fools.
10 posted on
01/23/2016 11:14:13 AM PST by
kingu
(Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
To: Elderberry
If you feel like it, join in the Free Republic Caucus (each day)
The more who participate, the louder the voice on Free Republic is revealed to be.
Go to the Caucus and express your support for one of the candidates.
Be sure to read the rules and follow them so your candidate will benefit from your vote.
Those who have been coming by, good job. I appreciate your participation.
Thank you.
LINK to Caucus 01/23/2016
The results are linked there at the bottom of the top of thread post.
Folks, if you haven't already and can manage it now, please support the FReepathon. Thank you. LINK
We've very lucky to have this forum where we can debate the issues of the day.
14 posted on
01/23/2016 11:28:12 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(Free Republic Caucus: vote daily / watch for the thread / Starts 01/20 midnight to midnight EDST)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson