What if science is wrong? (Saturbray)

www.braylog.com ^ | 1/23/16 | bray

[bray]

Romans 1:22 Professing themselves to be wise, they becamefools,

What if everything we know in science is wrong and we have been exploring bad science for the last hundred years. What if the entire science world is built on a false premise which has corrupted everything built from its foundation and steered us into complete fallacies. What if science is the source of many if not most of our problems from the environment to education to the economy? What if we have driven ourselves into a dead end street and God actually is real?

Back in the late eighteen hundreds science was rocked from its previous model of exploring God’s creation by a new theory called Darwinism. Everyone understands this theory which was developed from an agrarian view of the world of breeding livestock. What Darwin observed which every farmer in the world understands is that if you breed two large animals together odds are you come up with a large offspring? If two people with blue eyes have a baby it will have blue eyes, unless there is another more dominate color in the family tree. This was the start of his theory.

As everyone knows Darwin traveled to the Galapagos Islands which he assumed there was no interbreeding and came up with the theory of amoebas to man being caused by random chance. He saw the beak of a Puffer was larger than those on surrounding islands and theorized this was a step towards a new species. The fact is the large beak was an adaptation to the unique environment and the species adapted to that island, but there was no actual changing of that specie or has ever changed a species.

The interesting factor Darwin left out of his observations of the changing size and quality of animals which has been known since animals were domesticated is the farmers made most of that happen. Darwin told future scientists if this evolution of the species could not be validated in the next twenty or fifty years it was a false theory. This theory has existed for 150 years and there has not been a single substantiated example of transitory specie in the fossil record.

The lack of evidence has not been for lack of trying since the first scientist who finds proof is immediately inducted into the science hall of fame. There have been plenty of fakes and fraud fossils in there craven attempts to validate a theory which has holes the size of the George Washington Tunnel. The first and most obvious is where did this chain of life begin? You cannot ask that question since every one of their explanations is even more ridiculous than the theory itself.

The original theory is it came from space and landed in the primordial stew, but how does a life form survive the over thousand degree temperatures of entry. So science gave up on that and went with the amoeba to man chain with random adaptations leading from one species to the next over billions of years. The biggest flaw by far is there is no validation of this theory in the fossil record and as a matter of fact it appears that the animals all showed up at the same time fully developed. How could the fossils not only not be found but basically prove the theory wrong?

The more science looks into this theory the less probable it appears. As scientists learn more and more about DNA and the cell the more they find greater difficulty explaining how this could occur. No other species has been able to communicate let alone have the ability to control their environment or let alone communicate or read and write. The miracle of reading this post and translating it into your understanding is light years from a monkey. The evolutionary distance from ape to man is the same distance from amoeba to ape and yet no actual fossil record of those millions of man apes anywhere in the world should shout volumes.

The reason evolution is still taught is science has decided it is settled science. When something in science is settled it means that there will no longer be any counter research and all of the past research is enough to confirm the theory. When a science is settled which is not scientific, the science community builds a fort and nobody is allowed in who does not agree to that thought and if they are inside the fort are thrown out.

Anybody who would look at evolution with a skeptical eye would realize no matter how many billions of years you give it it does not have a chance of one in a billion of changing species once let alone the billions of times these evolutions would have to occur in the right direction. This is the basic foundation of all of modern science which should bring into question the rest of science such as the Peak Oil theory, fracking and destroying the aquifer and everyone’s favorite Global Warming, all Junk Science made up with no proof.

What if almost all of science is wrong? This foundation has led to so many wrong findings such as DDT causing bird eggs to thin even though it never happened, causing millions of malaria deaths worldwide. The same junk science declared the ozone hole to be growing and caused Freon to be outlawed making for much higher energy usage. Same with the Spotted Owl, Acid Rain, Polar Bear extinction, thousands of endangered species causing draught hardships in California and of course the biggest fraud in history Global Warming which the President claims is the biggest threat to America.

We are finding cholesterol may be a beneficial chemical in older people to lubricate their veins and salt is a vital ingredient in the body. There are new techniques in sports medicine such as mind and body may heal brain and nerve centers which thought to not be possible as well as healing and preventing concussions using new radical mental techniques. As it turns out scientists outside of academia are leading the way as they move away from groupthink such as Darwinism and open their minds to the miracle of the world and God’s creation.

What if everything we know about science is wrong and we are just as wrong about Marxism being the only way to feed and house three hundred million people let alone three billion. What if that agrarian theory which was invented in the Russian revolution and promoted throughout the twentieth century is a fraud and only enriches the inner circle by stealing from the producers? What if capitalism is actually a much more efficient way and the invisible hand would actually feed and house more in a much better lifestyle through individual achievement?

What if everything we know about government is wrong and is built on the same faulty foundation? What if just like evolution and its one in a billion possibility is really zero and God is real then we have wasted a century chasing smoke and ash when we should have been finding how to become better stewards of this amazing miracle. How much farther along would we be? What if everything we claim we know is completely false? What if science is wrong and God is real? What if God is the answer to every mystery?

Pray America wakes

[E. Pluribus Unum]

"Peer review" where only selected peers who agree are allowed to review is not peer review.

Michael Manns' now discredited "hockey stick" graph was peer-reviewed... by his buddies.

http://a-sceptical-mind.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-hockey-stick

[gusty]

I think you are creating a false conflict between God and Science. I personally reconcile the two by postulating that creation occurred at the beginning of time, and everything unleashed after that singular occurrence was science. Look at it that God created Science, evolution included. Science is all part of the plan. Our job has been to try to figure it all out, otherwise we would all still be living in mud houses herding our sheep.

[aquila48]

This idiocy is what gives fundamentalists a bad reputation... and rightly so.

[bray]

The atheist bullies are out in force. You must believe in our god science or else.

How is that Global Warming science working for the world?

[aquila48]

How is the computer you typed that on working?

Do you drive a car? Have you flown on a plane? Do you use electricity? Do you use a toilet? Do you have light bulbs in your house? A washing machine?....

[DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis]

Conclusions based on agendas are often wrong but conclusions based on science are not

As long as it's real science...There is plenty of phony science out there like global warming and evolutionary "science"....

[bray]

Apples and oranges argument. You are talking technology which has less junk science than biology and classic sciences. Nice try though.

Keep worshiping that Global Warming theology.

[Lazamataz]

So Global Warming is real?

Sure it is. So is Global Cooling.

You just threw out all science because some quacks are misusing it. You're a good guy but this article is wrongheaded.

[bray]

According to you. Maybe you are the one who is wrongheaded?

[Lazamataz]

According to you. Maybe you are the one who is wrongheaded?

Well, no. Not according to me. According to my computer, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to my firearms, which function based on scientific discoveries. According to my cell phone, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to my car, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to the power grid, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to my medicines, which function based on scientific discoveries. According to my television, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to my refrigerator, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to the internet, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to my radio, which functions based on scientific discoveries. According to airplanes, which function based on scientific discoveries.

So who's wrongheaded here?

[JimRed]

What if we have driven ourselves into a dead end street and God actually is real?

Belief in God and in (proven) science are not mutually exclusive.

[aquila48]

Technology is applied science.

Your ridiculous diatribe is against ALL science.

It’s one thing to be rationally critical of any particular theory, it’s another thing to make a fool of yourself by denying or being blind to obvious reality like you did.

You may want to be a bit more self-critical before you embark on your next missive. Be your own devil’s advocate and not paint with such broad brushes.

[bray]

You are talking about technology which is apples and oranges. I gave you more examples of junk science that is a waste of time and energy.

What if all of your examples would be multiplied exponentially if we would focus on real science rather than corrupted agenda driven science? You are accepting this is all we can do while I am saying this is in spite of science.

Laz you are a great guy too, but what if you are wrong? What if we have been wrong for a long time?

[Secret Agent Man]

Yup.

And in adition to consensus, liberals also use intimidation.

[Right Wing Assault]

Modern science is also run by consensus....it’s called peer review.

Scientific consensus changes with new information.

Liberal consensus changes when they need it to back up their current agenda.

However, some 'scientists' try to change the consensus to support their political agenda, so the differences are decreasing.

[itsahoot]

Modern science is also run by consensus....it’s called peer review.

They all work for the same government grant money. Try getting any Government funded research job after noting on your application that Global Warming is a fraud.

[itsahoot]

Well, then just how is it (to mention only a more-recent example) that those scientists managed to manoever the space probe Dawn to within a few hundred km of Pluto last summer, take a slew of high-resolution images, and beam them 5 billion km back to Earth?

To be honest very little science was involved in that operation. Only Math and engineering, those are developed skills not new discoveries.

[itsahoot]

So I am getting some of the nastiest emails I have ever received on FR. Guess I am flying over the fort.

Crevo threads are the only thing capable of more vitriol that the current Trump/Cruz/Palin threads.

[itsahoot]

Laz you are a great guy too, but what if you are wrong? What if we have been wrong for a long time?

Rush posed that question some time back. What if everything you know is wrong?

There were no classified documents on Hillary's server, most of us will not believe that but what will future generations know about that from official recorded history? History also records scientific advances/discoveries some of them may even be recorded accurately, many won't be. I suppose most truth will eventually out, but not always. In reality Truth is always what we perceive it to be, new truths come about when new facts change our perception, that is the reality of perception.

Remember those evil Krauts and Nips that we had to change our perception of, in order to easily accept the massive killing that brought the war's end?

[bray]

Well said. The people who write the history use it to promote their agenda. Science and God could easily coexist if there was not an agenda behind it.