Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody

If 1790 act is definition for natural born, why didn’t Cruz cite that as making him natural born, when asked specifically in the last debate. And why does the Constitutional requirement to hold the office, used the words ‘natural born’ .... Why does it not say eligibility requirements under the 1790 act? There is a difference in natural born and naturalized citizen... Both parents must be US citizens to ‘birth’ a natural born citizen. Cruz’s father was not an US citizen when Cruz was born in Canada...


100 posted on 01/20/2016 11:33:10 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Just mythoughts
If 1790 act is definition for natural born, why didn’t Cruz cite that as making him natural born, when asked specifically in the last debate.

I don't know about the debate, but he has definitely cited the 1790 Act in his defense.

And why does the Constitutional requirement to hold the office, used the words ‘natural born’ .... Why does it not say eligibility requirements under the 1790 act?

LOL! The Constitution came first. Then came the 1790 Act.

There is a difference in natural born and naturalized citizen... Both parents must be US citizens to ‘birth’ a natural born citizen. Cruz’s father was not an US citizen when Cruz was born in Canada...

The difference turns on whether or not a person is a citizen by birth. Ted Cruz is a citizen by birth. Henry Kissinger is a perfectly fine American, but not a citizen by birth. Ted is qualified. Henry is not. As is obvious to all who do not have an axe to grind!

109 posted on 01/20/2016 11:58:59 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson