I would ask that ALL Trump supporters stick to the facts they have to rebut the narrative presented here. If you attack the sources or the poster, I will assume that you have no valid argument against the contentions here. If you attempt to change the topic, I will take that as affirmation of these very serious accusations.
ok, I understand your request, but I’m still curious what CW stands for in Charles CW Cooke? Certified Weenie?
Narrative? What narrative?
There's nothing but spite and invective. There's no there, there.
This screed reflects much more poorly on the writer than the subjects of the article.