Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bruce Campbells Chin
But honestly, what sane person would oppose even a PSA campaign encouraging trigger locks?

Who's paying for it? Government? Then I unalterably oppose it.

19 posted on 01/19/2016 10:29:35 AM PST by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: NorthMountain
The government already requires public service announcements on a whole variety of subjects, including education and a bunch of liberal causes. So given that PSA have to be made anyway, why not flip a few of those to saving lives?

Anyway, you're missing the point. Regardless of how you feel about government spending, Obama and his ilk have absolutely no problem making a whole bunch of anti-gun proposals that cost money. Cost is not an issue to them. So, given that cost is not an issue to them, why aren't they pushing something like trigger locks?

Heck, he's given enough speeches on the topic. Why isn't he at least using the free bully pulpit to encourage people to use them? That's the question to which I'd like to hear an answer.

21 posted on 01/19/2016 10:35:06 AM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson