[robert14]

Do not trust anything Scientific American says. Any orginization that supports manmade global warming is not scientific and cannot be believed.

[TexasGator]

Facts, please

[sheik yerbouty]

“0buttbongo Science”

[TruthFactor]

That is a very good point! I started reading SA back in the early 70’s when I was a kid. My, how they’ve fallen.

[ronnie raygun]

In order for the scientists to survive they need government money, tow the line and you get fed dont and you starve

[Montana_Sam]

Do not trust anything Scientific American says. Any orginization that supports manmade global warming is not scientific and cannot be believed.

Ditto - in spades. S.A. is all out for the Obama line, and wants to see the coal industry dead. They hate poor people and third world countries whose best bet for a better life is the energy from relatively cheap coal.

[Flash Bazbeaux]

I have heard since the Anti-Nuke debates of the 1970s that coal ash has a measurable amount of radioactivity — whether it’s 100 times, I don’t recall, but people are generally ignorant about what’s radioactive and what isn’t, the relative amounts, and the different types.

The point at that time was that you should not freak out over something which is no more dangerous than a long-accepted environmental condition which NO ONE worries about.

Concrete is radioactive too.