Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: FBI Director,Not Bernie Sanders Will Determine Democratic Nominee
breitbart.com ^ | January 14, 2016 | Jeff Poor

Posted on 01/14/2016 7:56:15 AM PST by Biggirl

Wednesday on the Fox News Channel’s “Special Report,” Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer weighed in on the Democratic side of the president primary race. Despite Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) showing strength against Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton in Iowa and New Hampshire, Krauthammer was skeptical of Sanders chances beyond that and predicted it would be FBI director James Comey who has the final say in Clinton’s chances beyond the early primaries.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: democrats; fbi; sanders

1 posted on 01/14/2016 7:56:15 AM PST by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Maybe. Maybe not.

Inevitable Hillary kicked off her 2008 campaign by finishing THIRD in the Iowa caucuses, but limped in the end to have slightly more primary votes than Obama. Party insider superdelegates then kicked her to the curb to lock it up for Osama.


2 posted on 01/14/2016 8:01:40 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

As long as Bernie wins one of three primaries...I think numbers-wise, with the super-delegates...he could still win at the convention. It’ll be curious to see if Hillary can win in Florida or throughout the south.


3 posted on 01/14/2016 8:04:54 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Krauthammer keeps losing credibility. He actually praised Nikki Haley’s lifeless, clenched-jaw rebuttal that was no rebuttal.


4 posted on 01/14/2016 8:05:15 AM PST by apocalypto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Kraut is right. It depends on whether Comey publicly states his objection to AG Lynch’s private decision to decline prosecution.


5 posted on 01/14/2016 8:07:07 AM PST by henkster (Hillary Clinton's supporters are beginning to realize they are fettered to a corpse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
The only thing the FBI director can do is put a dent in ship Hillary. The DEM party can put Sanders, or Warren, or Biden, or anybody else it want to, as the person the electors will vote for in the presidential election.

Just saying, sinking Hillary isn't the same thing as deciding the final outcome. It merely removes one option.

6 posted on 01/14/2016 8:08:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
If Hillary were to win big in Iowa and NH, Comey might weary of recommending an indictment, as it would have the effect of gutting the candidacy of one of the two ultimate nominees for the White House. However, she's on track to get clobbered in NH, and she's in a dead heat in Iowa, but her support is collapsing daily. If she loses both, and especially if she does so badly...then Comey, and Lynch, and even Obama might be far more inclined to let it all come out, and indict.

You have to assume that Obama detests the Clintons, both for what they did and said in the 2008 campaign, but now, with a Clinton in the WH in 2016, Obama has zero influence in the Dem party..so, he can easily solve that little problem

7 posted on 01/14/2016 8:08:40 AM PST by ken5050 (helpful co)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

It all depends on whether Teflon Hillary is brought to trial for her crimes.

The FBI may be too optimistic to believe that they can manage that.


8 posted on 01/14/2016 8:24:45 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I assume DoJ is completely in Obama’s control, as it has been since he took office. AG Lynch isn’t going to do anything on this that Obama doesn’t direct.

So then, the real question is whether Obama is able to influence Comey, and would he? The concept in play is that of “mutually assured destruction” (remember the cold war and ours vs. USSR’s nukes?).

If Obama controls Comey (seems possible), then Obama giving the green light on a criminal referral to the DoJ means Hillary will never be President. If an indictment occurs, Hillary would then undoubtedly unload on Obama - and you know she knows a lot (like where the “stand-down” order came from, or what Obama was doing the night of Benghazi). She might even know of impeachable offenses.

So, if Obama CAN control Comey, then Obama has to decide if a criminal referral sent to the DoJ, and subsequent indictment, is worth the risk to his own reputation and legacy, should Hillary go nuclear. If he can’t control Comey, even if Hillary believes he can’t, she still might burn down the house.

My guess? UNBELIEVABLE pressure on Comey to hold back, as it’s the only way Obama comes out unscathed.


9 posted on 01/14/2016 8:38:21 AM PST by Be Free (I believe in gun control. The more people that control their own guns, the safer we'll all be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

Seems by Obama’s SOTU campaign commercial he is going to get Biden the nomination. Hillary is toast.


10 posted on 01/14/2016 8:39:19 AM PST by CodeToad (Islam should be banned and treated as a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

I’m tellin’ ya, Bernie is for REAL.

Whenever I am around groups of people under 30 the excitement is GENUINE and it’s REAL.

That seems absurd and incredulous to all of us here....but it’s true.

This generation has concluded that Free College is a pretty cool idea and it’s time for the US to scrap capitalism and try something new. Bernie is their guy, and he is going to do shockingly well.


11 posted on 01/14/2016 8:54:13 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Whenever I am around groups of people under 30 the excitement is GENUINE and it’s REAL.

It was the same with Howard Dean, this too shall pass.

12 posted on 01/14/2016 8:55:12 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

And Hussein will ultimately direct what the FBI Director directs.


13 posted on 01/14/2016 9:12:41 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apocalypto

It was more a supplement than a rebuttal.


14 posted on 01/14/2016 9:13:54 AM PST by arthurus (Het is waar. Tutti i liberali sono feccia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

The server in the closet may already be the straw that broke the camels back

Hillarys moment in the sun may now be a sunset


15 posted on 01/14/2016 9:19:43 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
I still say there in no way, none, that hilliary will be indicted.

Charles' is playing useful idiot here, pretending that the gov still has credibility- it doesn't.

16 posted on 01/14/2016 9:23:33 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
To me, the resemblance to 1968 may be the real point:
LBJ was the sitting president, and his renomination was a foregone conclusion. Sound familiar? What happened? Gene McCarthy won New Hampshire - and LBJ decided he was too busy running the Vietnam War and “accordingly I will not seek - nor will I accept - the nomination of my party for a second term as president of the United States.”


17 posted on 01/14/2016 10:17:27 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

McCarthy did not win the 1968 New Hampshire primary. He dramatically ‘outperformed expectations’.


18 posted on 01/14/2016 10:24:38 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
McCarthy did not win the 1968 New Hampshire primary. He dramatically ‘outperformed expectations’.
You are absolutely right - which only makes the point stronger.

The point is that inevitability can be a real burden to meet expectations.


19 posted on 01/14/2016 11:26:01 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ('Liberalism' is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl

At this point, the selfies that Hillary! took standing over the still-warm corpse of Vince Foster could surface and it wouldn’t make any difference. If she gets elected, she’ll be the first president in history to grant herself a pardon.


20 posted on 01/14/2016 2:49:13 PM PST by Clioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson