Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: reaganaut1

‘I don’t want to make a nasty, arrogant blowhard like Trump the most powerful man in the world.’

Well, then you contributed to making a nasty arrogant blowhard like Hillary the most powerful woman in the world.

When that happens, kiss your liberties good, idiot!


2 posted on 01/14/2016 5:41:42 AM PST by ObozoMustGo2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ObozoMustGo2012

NOT your words [for sake of others reading] ...

‘I don’t want to make a nasty, arrogant blowhard like Trump the most powerful man in the world.’

What we need is someone willing to confront powerful world leaders. The USA has played ‘nice’ and fluffy and sweetness diplomatically ever since WWII. Where did that get us?

GW Bush tried the ‘New Tone’ with the democrats. Where did that get us?

Only a useful idiot would think that Trump’s aggressiveness is a ‘negative’.


30 posted on 01/14/2016 5:54:17 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (1000 muslim migrant gang-rapists in Germany -- Trump helped trigger protests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

BINGO. If anyone here at FR would leave a ballot blank in Trump vs Hillary. A) They need to get their head examined and B) Even sooner, cancel your FR account and go away. We have a liberty-loving, pro-American who will champion American jobs and world leadership. Alternatively, we have a dunce who preaches this week about banning guns, white terrorists, islamophobia and dumping millions of foreigners into our country. That ignores the disaster of Hillary replacing a conservative Supreme Court justice and tilting the court fully to the left.


54 posted on 01/14/2016 6:04:07 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Clearly, somebody is “misunderestimating” The Donald.

Certainly, his stage manner, and his application to the subjects at hand, looks almost bombastic, and takes on the aura of a parody, but beneath it all, The Donald is always thinking, sending out his words like scouts kind of sizing up the positions of opponents, then either being pulled back if excessive resistance is obvious, or going back in and slipping within the defenses of the rival, and verbally blowing up the other person’s argument. It may not be college-level debate, but it certainly is a lot more entertaining, as part of the game is, after blowing up the other person’s argument, The Donald comes back in and damns them even further with faint praise that first looks like it is congratulatory, but still leaves the germ of an idea in the audience’s minds, that The Donald was right from the beginning. Subliminal, but it seems to be working. Else why would The Donald be playing before overflow crowds wherever he goes?


103 posted on 01/14/2016 6:24:36 AM PST by alloysteel (If I considered the consequences of my actions, I would rarely do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

Well the New York Times has spoken. We can’t vote for Cruz or Trump. I guess that leaves Hillary unopposed.


125 posted on 01/14/2016 6:35:36 AM PST by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: ObozoMustGo2012

.... When that happens, kiss your liberties good, idiot!
Trump has no clue about liberties. You show your allegiance to your guy very well - don’t agree with someone call them names. Very childish, just like DT.


137 posted on 01/14/2016 6:40:19 AM PST by libbylu (Cruz: The truth with a smile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson