Isn’t he saying the opposite thing here?
“AL: I’d like to talk about public land. Seventy percent of hunters in the West hunt on public lands managed by the federal government. Right now, there’s a lot of discussion about the federal government transferring those lands to states and the divesting of that land. Is that something you would support as President? “
“DT: I don’t like the idea because I want to keep the lands great, and you don’t know what the state is going to do. I mean, are they going to sell if they get into a little bit of trouble? And I don’t think it’s something that should be sold. We have to be great stewards of this land. This is magnificent land. And we have to be great stewards of this land. And the hunters do such a great job-I mean, the hunters and the fishermen and all of the different people that use that land. So I’ve been hearing more and more about that. And it’s just like the erosion of the Second Amendment. I mean, every day you hear Hillary Clinton wants to essentially wipe out the Second Amendment. We have to protect the Second Amendment, and we have to protect our lands.”
Full interview at the link
Yes, because Trump just blabs whatever comes to mind.
We have no idea what he will do. None. He flips *daily* now. He also just said he thinks the establishment is a good thing, and Reagan worked with Tip O’Neill. (But there were - count ‘em - eight government shutdowns!) He got the idea from Chris Matthews. It’s a fable. And this is after Sarah Palin called him awesome on taking on the establishment!
Donald Trump is now FOR federal ownership of land. He’d want as much as he could get his hands on. It’s totally within his nature and emotional construct.