But not in the Constitution, which makes yours a stupid argument, based on wishful thinking.
The constitution is not a dictionary. The only specific definition in the constitution is for treason. The framers used terms that were understood to all fairly well educated people of the time. (as in the “well regulated militia” in the 2nd amendment) They didnt include a definition for high crimes and misdeameanors either, but that hasn’t stopped impeachment proceedings. A well established principle of constitutional application is that NO words in the constitution are superfluous. The SOLE purpose of the natural born citizen requirement is to protect the office of POTUS from undue foreign influence, particularly thru a FATHER owing allegiance to a foreign sovereignty. The framers were patriarchs and just viewed things that way. Natural born is a higher standard that citizen for very good constitutional reasons and rationales.
Mine is a correct statement. Your argument is wishful thinking.