Posted on 01/08/2016 1:12:01 PM PST by jazusamo
Are the victims of being denied by government a firearm for protection be represented?
An empty seat to match the empty suit at the empty podium.
The person who gets to do the rebuttal should have multiple empty seats:
One for the Libyan embassy employees Hillary Clinton left for dead.
One for all the black Americans in Chicago killed by gun violence from other blacks,
One for all those killed by illegal aliens, the type that Democrats believe should get amnesty.
One for the Iraqis and Afghanis killed because Obama pulled out American troops.
One for the undermanned American troops Obama left in.
One for all the jobs that left the country after Obama moved into the White House...
If Republicans had a spine they’d seat Clint Eastwood right next to it. But seriously, doesn’t Congress make the rules about who gets what seat? I mean, it is their chamber.
Not good enough. To honour the victims of abortion, they'd have to empty the whole room.
So what do all the full seats represent then? People who were SAVED by guns?
And I believe The empty seat represents his leadership, not gun violence victims
He’s trying to turn around what Clint Eastwood did to humiliate him with the empty chair- Dear leader can’t even come up with an original thought it seems
No empty seat for the brave men and women killed in Afghanistan under his feckless leadership.
Let’s do an empty row of seats to honor all the victims of mass murdering leftists.
That’s nothing, nobody is watching his arse anyhow. Cantstandchou.
The worst part is the empty suit doing the speaking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.