[DoodleDawg]

There was invasive plants encroaching on the land - this tells us a couple of things: carrying capacity is reduced, the BLM did not do their job in maintaining the range.

That's the Hamilton's story. The BLM claims the fire was to disguise illegal hunting. Who know which is the truth?

[mass55th]

"The BLM claims the fire was to disguise illegal hunting. "

Where's their proof of that? And if any existed, I wonder if it was ever entered into evidence?

[GilesB]

Aaaaaah - there is a disagreement, that is friction!