When Muslims are the target, prominent religious freedom advocates largely go quiet

WaPo ^ | 12/30/2015 | Michelle Boorstein

[combat_boots]

Joe won’t play softball, so Bill should cook chili for dinner. Logic, liberal style.

[Nuc 1.1]

Thank you. You are completely correct.

[skeeter]

You are right - Islam is a political system.

However, Islam’s MSM apologists are not only silent when Christians are attacked, they’re likely the ones doing the attacking.

Hypocrite doesn’t begin to describe these pieces of garbage.

[freeandfreezing]

You can tell the article is nonsense when it starts off by misrepresenting the statements of the Republican candidates. If I recall correctly, Carson's comment was in essence that someone who truly believed in Islam, and the supremacy of Sharia Law, could not truthfully take the oath of office required for the President, and hence could not serve in that office.

Similarly, we hear faked outrage from the Washington Post over suggestions of creating a database with information on people who are likely to be or become Islamic extremists. But that database already exists, and we've got the President proposing to take away peoples 2nd amendment rights if they are on it. Anybody who thinks about it for more than ten seconds knows that existing federal anti terror databases are essentially databases of Muslims, and no doubt include data which lets a user search the database by religion.

Typical WaPo propaganda.

[fella]

Dear WaPo,

In case you’ve missed it. Islam has been engaged in a war of world conquest since about 660AD. We, the USA, are it’s main target at this time. When one is under attack it’s a fairly good idea to start fighting back.