Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Typical liberal program. Fool the public with unrealistic projections then stick them with the bill when costs exceed and revenues fall short of projections. The failure of Austin's recycling program is probably typical of municipal recycling programs across the country.
1 posted on 01/02/2016 11:14:25 AM PST by JeepersFreepers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: JeepersFreepers

Hmmm...that was “unexpected”.


2 posted on 01/02/2016 11:19:05 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Actually, it IS possible to profitably recycle...but as soon as the government gets involved, just like everything else, it turns into crap.


3 posted on 01/02/2016 11:20:24 AM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Quelle surprise. /s


4 posted on 01/02/2016 11:21:51 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

If I thought that stuff that I throw away had any value,
well ... then I wouldn’t be throwing it away.


5 posted on 01/02/2016 11:22:21 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Aluminum isn’t worth what it once was even a few years ago, so the payout from recycling aluminum cans isn’t there. Industrial metals in general have fallen.


7 posted on 01/02/2016 11:24:55 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

It doesn’t matter that it is unsustainable, we all “feel” better don’t we?


8 posted on 01/02/2016 11:25:23 AM PST by Blue Collar Christian (Ready for Teddy, Cruz that is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

I help save my town money by NOT recycling.


9 posted on 01/02/2016 11:26:11 AM PST by BobL (Who cares? He's going to build a wall and stop this invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers
The very first munis to do it made money. Maybe even the next round to jump in. Once the supply outstrips the demand, it not only costs to get rid of it, but all the now-useless programs become a drag on the taxpayers as well.

But all the do-gooders still get to feel good at others' expense.

11 posted on 01/02/2016 11:27:11 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers
Unexpected!

12 posted on 01/02/2016 11:28:27 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Our county commission sold the public on a new single-stream recycling facility afew years ago with the claim that it would be a money maker. It now loses $300K per year.


13 posted on 01/02/2016 11:32:23 AM PST by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Not just there... also in Montana

http://mtstandard.com/questions-answers-on-butte-s-pilot-trash-pick-up-recycling/article_13d43da5-a269-5cb6-bdc4-e34b0820af0b.html";

(still haven’t found out how this person obtained this job/position. She always had her nose buried in a book at the library when I visited)


15 posted on 01/02/2016 11:33:55 AM PST by This_far
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Any successful recycling program is going to lose money. Only the liberals think ‘we’re smart enough to make it work’.


16 posted on 01/02/2016 11:38:50 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

I wouldn’t be surprised. You’re probably close to the truth there if not quite there. I agree with your statement.

It’s not with a lot of joy that I come to that conclusion, because we are a large population and we are a consumable society.

We have a lot of trash. If we could recycle most of it at a profit and reuse it, that would be a great outcome.

I do wonder if they are thinking smart in how they are gong about it. Perhaps they are and it could never work.

I’d sure like to have some very capable people review the processes before tossing in the towel.

Even burning some of the waste to create energy should result in some profit.

Increasing landfill is not optimal.


17 posted on 01/02/2016 11:39:11 AM PST by DoughtyOne ((It's beginning to look like "Morning in America" again. Comment on YouTube under Trump Free Ride.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

There’a SIMPLE SOLUTION. Privatize it.


19 posted on 01/02/2016 11:51:31 AM PST by jessduntno (The mind of a liberal...deceit, desire for control, greed, contradiction and fueled by hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

The headline is wrong.
It brought in the expected profits to the political donors.


23 posted on 01/02/2016 12:02:47 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

I have to tell you, the combination of recycling and a bio fuel electric plant has cut costs in our area. Significantly.

The town is pretty strict about recycling, and they started charging for extra bags/cans of trash. I thought it sucked at first, but the extra costs have been offset by better focus on recycling.

These guys must be doing it wrong, or paying off the wrong crooks. Because in outer area of about 150,000 people it really works.


25 posted on 01/02/2016 12:03:31 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

I suspect it brought the expected profits, just not the advertised profits. Anyone who thinks recycling (except maybe metals) is cost effective is a fool.


26 posted on 01/02/2016 12:05:57 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Just another gummit boondoggle designed to give workers 100K jobs.

Pray America wakes


27 posted on 01/02/2016 12:11:01 PM PST by bray (Trump/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

We used to recycle newspapers when I was in grade school 45 years ago. I wonder how much of that was a scam?


28 posted on 01/02/2016 12:12:37 PM PST by PLMerite (The Revolution...will not be kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JeepersFreepers

Yes but it makes liberals “feel” good and after all, isn’t that what’s important?

In the mean time, I will continue to burn my old tires and card board packing crates.

Tip - Packaging that comes with Christmas toys, that hard plastic stuff, makes thick black, pungent, smoke and smolders for a very long time.


30 posted on 01/02/2016 12:35:43 PM PST by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson