>>>>It is time for a deep research and exposition of Soros.<<<<<
Back when there was a lot of posting re zero’s eligibility -— trying to make this as short as possible -— as I recall, it is up to the Secretarys of State of each state to ok whether a candidate put up by a party is qualified.
Butterdezillion did a WHOLE LOT of work on this.
I think it was discovered that Geo Soros himself was behind the electing/installing of the SoS’s of some/many/just enough/? or all of the SoS so that the phony dimorat would be approved - so I guess by all the states.
Apparently they all did - exception for Hawaii who was given a slightly lesser of what it had to sign off on.
ie allowing wiggle room for them - who just might have known that broncobama was not in fact eligible.
Close. Hawaii actually required more than the rest of the states did, and Obama never met that requirement, since Brian Schatz, head of the HI Democratic Party, refused to sign a statement that Obama was Constitutionally qualified. And in literally cutting out one line of text from the HI Dem Party’s standard certificate of nomination, they also took out the language required by HI, to say that the candidate was not only the NATIONAL party’s candidate but also the candidate of HAWAII’s Democratic Party.
The Obama apologists would say that since the DNC made a Certificate of Nomination specially for HI that had NANCY PELOSI signing that Obama is Constitutionally eligible, it made it so that HI only had to certify that he was their candidate - and that this change from how the certifications were usually done was deliberate. But the booboo with the HI certification shows it was NOT deliberate, but a last-minute switcheroo, since literally cutting out one line of text from the HI Dem Party’s standard form ended up making it useless for HI’s specific demand that the HI Dems certify Obama as their specific candidate.
There was a reason for all that. Remember the “Recreate ‘68” movement that was going on - where the radical left was gathering in Denver to cause trouble if the election didn’t go their way? That wasn’t a threat to R’s since R’s weren’t even part of that. That was a threat to Hillary, who (according to the devisor of the plan) planned to submit a petition that would require a second round of votes, thereby releasing delegates to vote for Hillary even if Obama won their caucus/primary, and then Hillary was going to present the evidence that Obama is not eligible. The plan was panned after Bill Clinton’s good friend, Bill Gwatney, was killed by a “random shooter” the day after he agreed to present the petition, and Stephanie Tubbs suffered what was called an aneurysm days after she agreed to take Gwatney’s place - all within the last 2 weeks before the DNC Convention.
So the DNC Convention was a zoo. Obama’s people were committing threats and violence against delegates, leading to the PUMA’s (Party Unity, My Ass!). A lot of crimes were committed at the DNC Convention as well as leading up to it, and it all centered around Obama’s known ineligibility.
Obama would have been arrested then and there, except for a gray suit didn’t want to suffer political consequences and so nixed what had already been agreed to, when he found it was Obama.
So the DNC Convention was fraught with doubts about how far Hillary’s people might go in proving Obama ineligible. The Clintons themselves had allegedly finally been silenced when it was threatened that Chelsea would be killed if they spoke out - not an idle threat after Gwatney and Tubbs both died within days of agreeing to set the stage for Obama’s ineligibility to be exposed. But Hillary supporter Phil Berg had filed his lawsuit suing the DNC for an ELIGIBLE candidate the day after Tubbs died, and that judge didn’t do a 180 and dismiss that case until right after Obama suddenly went to HI to visit his “dying Grandmother” in mid-October (around the same time as the Soros threats against the media heads if they allowed anybody to mention Obama’s ineligibility and Muslim leanings...)
In that setting, Schatz - who had actually been in Kenya when the Obamas visited shortly before their wedding and undoubtedly knew that the Kenyans claimed he was born there - apparently didn’t want to risk being charged with perjury if Berg was successful and the truth came out. HI law allows someone representing a person for a legal purpose to get a copy of their long-form birth certificate, and there would be no excuse for Schatz - Obama’s HI campaign chairman - to not request a copy, since HI law required his Constitutional eligibility to be certified. Neither Schatz, Nancy Pelosi, nor any other national or state Dem party operative ever even asked to see Obama’s BC, and the HDOH illegally removed their Administrative Rules from the website where it was supposed to be publicly posted - thus hiding the rules that would show how easily these leaders could have checked Obama’s eligibility, as well as a bunch of other stuff damaging to Obama.
When I asked a HDP staffer who made the decision to change the standard Certificate of Nomination and when, he flew into a rage, called me names, and said he would not say anything about that.
The AZ SOS, under pressure from constituents, requested verification of Obama’s birth in HI. HI kept refusing to issue anything (as we knew they would because a colleague had been told by an HDOH official that they would not issue verifications for ANYBODY because then people would wonder why they would never issue a verification for Obama). And they never did issue a lawful verification, though they issued a document that indirectly verified that they have a legally non-valid BC on file claiming a HI birth. The document itself was stamped with the registrar’s signature but had initials behind it to signify that Onaka did not do the signing (initials which are not used on other documents where Onaka’s name stamp is used) and it had the embossed seal of the HDOH Director, which is only supposed to be used by the HDOH Director next to her signature. So they put out a verification of a legally non-valid BC, and the document was “signed” using the legally non-binding mismatched seal and signature.
And the HDOH director whose seal was used on that non-legally-binding fig leaf was claimed to have died of fright after a Cessna water landing fraught with anomalies.
The KS SOS also requested verification of a HI birth but received similarly-mismatched signature/seal that once again, only verified the existence of a legally non-valid BC.
Every SOS in the country, as well as the attorney for the DNC and the signers of Obama’s 2012 Certificate of Nomination received a certified-mail copy of a letter from attorney Larry Klayman explaining how the “verification” sent to AZ SOS Ken Bennett actually verified that Obama does NOT have a legally-valid BC in HI. Every SOS chose to ignore that truth.
The NE SOS told me that even if it had been proven that Obama was ineligible and Obama was sitting in jail for fraud and perjury, he (the SOS) would have to put the name on the ballot because state law doesn’t specifically say they can leave off the ballot names known to be fraudulently submitted by the DNC or RNC, even though state law DOES say that names on the ballot MUST be for eligible candidates.
IOW, the SOS’s are ALL basically saying that unless the law specifically says that ineligible Kenyan frauds have to be left off the ballot, they will put an ineligible Kenyan fraud on the ballot. And if the law said the above they would still put him on the ballot because it doesn’t say whether he had to be kept off PAPER or ELECTRONIC ballots (or some other similar false “vagueness” in the law that they could pull out of their hats in dire need).
AZ lawmakers sent a bill to the governor that would have required documentation of eligibility for Presidential candidates to be placed on the ballot. It was vetoed by the governor after a media blitz claiming that there would be chaos if state SOS’s had the ability to make decisions of such national import. IOW, the powers-that-be are talking out of both sides of their mouth. The Congressional Research office told Cognressional members that it is up to state SOS’s to vet the eligibility of candidates, but the SOS’s themselves as well s the whole media complex argues that would be terrible if it ever actually happened. IOW, they will use the state SOS’s as a legal fig leaf but they would never, EVER grant them REAL power to vet the candidates.
The NE SOS is so stupid that he said there is no need for official vetting of eligibility because the media would never give an ineligible candidate a free pass. I said the media doesn’t have the ability to see the legal documentation either but that didn’t matter to him. It is, after all, just the position of the person who could by executive order totally undo America and set the world on fire (as the current foreign enemy combatant in our White House has, coincidentally, just managed to do...).
America deserves the DArwin Award. Unfortunately, a lot of good, vigilant and honest people have to also be destroyed because of the dodo birds we’ve allowed to be elected. Sure, there is a threatened media that we’ve been battling and the whole system is hostage, but still it seems like we could have at least made our leaders PRETEND to care about the nation before signing it away.
An unrepentant Nazi collaborator poking the bear? Donald won’t be afraid to tell the world about this vile, evil man....