She is probably an expert on abnormality.
What is “normal” in the whole range of human traits?
Looking at the same set of facts OBJECTIVELY, and reasoning out a somewhat logical conclusion, is perhaps not the “normal” course of events, but then, more people are driven by emotion than by reason and logic.
Anthropogenic climate change is a wholly emotional response to the facts presented. There is no conclusive evidence that the changes in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the air affects in any way the degree of warmth in the air, oceans or land masses of earth. Carbon dioxide is a TRAILING indicator of either overall global warming or overall global cooling. There is no relationship of causation to effect.
Judging from her picture, I’m pretty sure she is confused about sexual identity. But, that is the new normal for the dims.
No. We are not normal. We are probably smarter, better educated technically, and have spent more time looking at the evidence for and against the AGW hypothesis, than those who drink the AGW cool-aid.