There’s two side to every story:
Not surprisingly, the Russians have furiously dismissed the claims by their former spy. ‘This theory about the plane being deliberately blown up on Putin’s orders can only come from someone with a sick mind who is intent on revenge,’ snorted one Russian intelligence source.
‘Look at Karpichkov’s background — he has fallen out with all his old sponsors whether in Moscow, Riga or London, and probably the CIA, too. No one trusts him, and he invents far-fetched nonsense. Linking it to the apartment block explosions — well, these were also absurd claims for which no proof was ever produced.’
But if it suits your agenda you’ll believe anything.
Wonder how many times this conspiracy theory will be posted.
In 2002 Russians tried to discredit Litvinenko with the same claim. Yes, Litvinenko was also owed by FSB not a small money. Theft is probably the least problem of Kremlin’s regime.
So it is worthy to think twice or maybe more...
I do not agree generally with Russian’s claims on anything. I have reservation to comments in media as well.
Karpichkov brought important info on Russian regime - historic and current information. There was an attempt on his life this is why he is under protection and changed name.
You are obviously free to put your faith in Moscow. if you reject an evidence which Litvinenko provided, then I am not sure what other evidence can convince you. Maybe one Putin will volunteer and tell you “I did it”. But I am not sure...