I should start a blood bank and charge a premium for “gay free” blood.
Though I suppose that would probably run afoul of some tyrannical bureaucratic rule nowadays, wouldn’t it?
How would you prove someone is not gay?
What we should have — and maybe we do — is a strict testing protocol for every pint of blood received. It will raise costs, but it is the only answer.
Reject blood at the level of the blood collection before it gets to a blood bank.
Screening is nice, but they’ve always been able to lie.
“I should start a blood bank and charge a premium for “gay free†blood.”
I was just thinking the same thing. The Red Cross will fall in line. If you set up a competing entity where you only select blood from healthy folks, there would be a market for it. Roll the dice on the diseased red cross blood, or pay more for quality control.
What would you pick if you needed it?