Posted on 12/09/2015 3:25:16 PM PST by dennisw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KVTmo2Vxnk
Nice surprise from Mark Steyn at 1 hour 43 minute
Steyn also testifies in the first hour for about 10 minutes
SENATE COMMITEE TESTIMONY
Dr Judith Curry at 35 minutes in
Mark Steyn at 47 minutes in
BOTH GET MORE LICKS IN AT THE START OF HOUR TWO
Cruz is great with the global warming junk science - he tears them to shreds.
Outstanding!
Markey and Titley got their heads handed to them by Sen. Cruz and Mark Steyn and others.
Thank you for posting this video.
Watch
bump for later- I just wish Cruz and Mark and others would start hammering the FACT home that man’s CO2 amounts to just 0.0036% of the atmosphere- and hammer home the FACT that such a small amount can not possibly be causing climate change- and also hammer home the FACT that temperatures always rise first, while CO2 always rises 800 years later- meaning that CO2 can’t possibly be responsible for climate change
I like to ask:
If you think mankind can control the temperature of the planet,
what temperature do you think we should we set the thermostat to?
FYI
Titley was wormy and irritating. An apple polishing student for Senator Markey
If anyone doubts Cruz’ leadership ability, just check him out chairing this committee. He definitely looks presidential.
Titley was wormy and irritating. An apple polishing student for Senator Markey
Yes he was. It was disgusting. And he is a retired Admiral which is a travesty.
Cruz’s closing statement was very powerful! Interesting how one of the panel drew the comparison of the “global warming/climate change” crowd to the Communists in the Soviet Union.
Saving this for tomorrow. Thank you, my friend.
Cruz is razor sharp in that hearing. He’s brilliant. so is Mark Steyn.
Bttt
I never said man can control it- my whole post was pointing out how ridiculous it is to say that man can control it when we cre4ate so little CO2 compared to the mass volume of atmosphere-
I think you misunderstood my post
Without CO2 there would be no plant life in the ocean. Sounds like a statement of the obvious but it can’t be absorbed by the ocean and holding in the heat at the same time.
This planet has survived way higher CO2 in the past- We’re not even 1/2 what it was in past- we now have almost 400 ppm- it was higher than 800 ppm in past- This ‘tipping point’ the left keeps yammering about is no tipping point at all- and just designed as a number to scare the bejeebers out of folks-
We couldn’t create enough CO2 to reach even 1% of the atmosphere if we multiplied our total world’s production of CO2 many 1000’s of times-
0.0036% of the atmosphere is nothing- it has nearly zero effect on capturing and back radiating heat- there ismply is not enough CO2 proiduced by man to do anything regarding climate change-
To put this in perspective- take an ordinary drinking glass- fill it with 100 degree water- dump it into an olypmpic sized pool of water that is 98 degrees, and you have a fairly good representation of just how little CO2 is in our atmosphere due to man, capturing heat- it is meaningless- as meaningless as claiming that that glass of water has caused ‘a catastrophic rise in pool temperature”
There is no way that glass of water can do anything to the pool’s temperature because there simply isn’t enough warmer water being dumped into the cooler pool-
Our atmosphere simply does not have enough CO2 in it to capture enough heat and back radiate it to earth to cause the earth to warm- it simply is impossible-
bump
I long for the days of tar and feathers, getting run out of town on a rail, stocks, reform schools, school expulsions, and public shaming.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.