Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
Okay, let's get reasonable.

When the Founders said "arms" they meant the best you could afford.

Should be the same today.

Repeal the NFA of 1934. Really.

If someone is going to use one of these firearms in a crime, there will be plenty to charge them with.

As far as full auto goes, why not?

Why should I have to lug a full-length shotgun around the corners in my house to defend my family from a home invasion? The shorter version would help.

Why should I have to pay a tax for something to make my firearm quieter and protect my hearing (and those next to me and cut down on the whining from people who just moved into the new development next to the shooting range?)

Why should I have to pay a tax to fully exercise a Right, and while we are at it, why can the average terrorist in the Middle East get a new AK-47 for three hundred bucks or so and I can't get one here at all?

Because 'daddy' (GHW) Bush signed that thing where I can't buy a NEW fully-automatic capable firearm, that's why, so repeal that crap, too. That ban amounts to a tremendous tax on those who just want to exercise their right more fully.

So be Reasonable for a change and get your judicial grubbies off of my Civil Rights!

11 posted on 12/07/2015 5:33:26 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
Because 'daddy' (GHW) Bush signed that thing where I can't buy a NEW fully-automatic capable firearm, that's why, so repeal that crap, too

That was Ronald Reagan not Bush.

14 posted on 12/07/2015 5:45:14 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson