[dayglored]

>> the investigators "determined that they lacked concrete evidence,...

> would have rather heard "there's no there there".

It's awful damn hard to "prove" a negative. Lack of concrete evidence is generally the best you can do, shy of having 24x7 video of the candidate for the past 10 years, including bathroom breaks.

[stylin19a]

I understand. The statement reads funny. NO evidence is NO evidence. Lack of concrete evidence is not the same as no evidence.