[AndyJackson]

We need a statesman, not an irresponsible flame thrower, and one can be a strong political leader who is cutting and fearless with words think of Winston Churchill without making a fool of oneself.

Your grammar sucks; Winston Churchill is not among the candidates for this office; and,Winston Churchill was also noteworthy for dealing for his swift, biting, personal put-downs of those who attacked him.

[Sans-Culotte]

Your grammar sucks; Winston Churchill is not among the candidates for this office; and,Winston Churchill was also noteworthy for dealing for his swift, biting, personal put-downs of those who attacked him.

Also, Churchill was not religious. In his great speeches, he does call on help from God because he was not a believer. He was a great man nonetheless.

[Jim Noble]

think of Winston Churchill without making a fool of oneself

Not only did Winston Churchill frequently make a fool of himself, by 1938 he was thought a fool by a strong majority.

He never won an election, and indeed the only time the Conservative Party stood for election with himself as PM, they were crushed. He had a reputation for public drunkenness, and was well known for crude remarks and behavior.

But the writer's selection of Churchill is apropos (I'm sure the writer doesn't get this): It was said of his public career that "he was wrong about everything, except the one thing that mattered".

In our time, the "one thing that matters" is restoring a nation of laws and of borders. About this one thing, there is only one candidate, and his name is Donald Trump.

[Kaslin]

Your grammar sucks;

News Flash!!!

I am not the author. I only posted the article, besides I am a she, not a he.

GOT IT?