Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top 10 Reasons to Vote for Ted Cruz
PJ Media ^ | November 24, 2015 | David P. Goldman

Posted on 11/26/2015 11:59:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: Cowboy Bob; Cobra64

I would encourage you both to review the US Constitution regarding the powers of the Vice Presidency visa via the US Senate:

The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.

The Senate shall chuse their other Officers, and also a President pro tempore, in the Absence of the Vice President, or when he shall exercise the Office of President of the United States.


Dick Cheney couldn’t impose his will on the US Senate, despite an evenly divided Senate in the first half of 2001. Yes he would definitely have some sway over the Congress and could push through bills— especially if the Trump/Cruz ticket is elected with a clear mandate— but being President of the Senate isn’t going to give him any more magical power.


81 posted on 11/27/2015 3:09:23 PM PST by brothers4thID ("We've had way too many Republicans whose #1 virtue is "I get along great with Democrats".")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: oldvirginian

- - show me where one party won four consecutive presidential elections - -
-
All I could find was this:
-
Ulysses S. Grant.....1869-1873
Ulysses S. Grant.....1873-1877
Rutherford B. Hayes..1877-1881
James Garfield.......1881-1883
Chester A. Arthur....1883-1885
-
William McKinley.....1897-1901
Theodore Roosevelt...1901-1905
Theodore Roosevelt...1905-1909
William H. Taft......1909-1913
-
Don’t know how accurate it is...


82 posted on 11/27/2015 3:23:00 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Post civil war the republicans did maintain control of the presidency.
Post reconstruction is a different story.

After the Civil War the Republicans would have had to been as incompetent as todays pubbies to lose an election.

In the political world of today it is virtually impossible for one political party to maintain power.
Information is more available quicker and to more people.

The electorate is just about as fractured as it was pre civil war only with more factions. Too many people offended about every little thing.

Short of a complete and total meltdown by either major party, I don’t think we will see either keep control for 16 consecutive years.


83 posted on 11/27/2015 3:51:42 PM PST by oldvirginian (American by birth, Southern by the grace of a loving God and Virginian because Jesus loves me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

“Cruz is a once-in-a-generation candidate. Why settle for second best?”

DITTO!


84 posted on 11/27/2015 8:23:31 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bkmk


85 posted on 11/27/2015 11:27:30 PM PST by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

What you posted is not FR slang. Here is further proof of your ailment: many hours later and your HDS is still active because you lack the maturity of me simply posting Huckabee/Cruz.

Can’t ever recall going off the deep-end (”Bwhaaa” to cut it way short) and responding many times even after long hours because someone simply posted Name/Name. You are a case study, actually.


86 posted on 11/28/2015 12:51:19 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

Comment #88 Removed by Moderator

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: stanne
Wikipedia is a risky source and for myself, personally, when I research anything, I ignore wiki as a source, and find info elsewhere in a large number of places online, and have to wade through and read through a lot. It takes longer, but ....

According to the 2015 Billionaires List here, Trump is worth $3.9 billion. Still plenty.

92 posted on 11/28/2015 1:59:13 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: erod
...voted for Obama ...

My fellow Cruz supporter (Cruz the ONLY guy in the race worth voting for), please allow me to correct you: Trump voted for McCain and Romney, if he is to be judged by his words on-the-record. He was a Democrat when McCain ran, yet officially endorsed McCain in 2008, and by the time Romney ran, had switched parties (for the third time in 26 years) to Republican. Just FYI.

All I had to see to understand that Trump is out of the running for my own vote was his explanation as to why McCain was only a war hero "because he was captured," and wasn't therefore really a war hero. I was stunned, shocked ... and enlightened. Cruz is absolutely the only guy in the race worth voting for.

93 posted on 11/28/2015 2:09:36 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Finny

Trump claims to be worth 9 billion

That’s my source

My point is that people say he inherited his money and 200 million divided among heirs at the age of 53 is not 9 billion nor is it 2.3 billion or one billion nor is it all of the money spent building buildings and employing people, which none of tge other candidates who get no scrutiny even on this forum get

I can tell you very definitely with my BA in English and my B in Science, having taught how to write research papers, that Wikipedia on this forum FR is quite substantial as people do not do the simplest Google search

And more specifically, my point about Trump is well mad from wiki as the difference between what you say, which refutes even Trump , 3 or whatever billion

So as mark levin would shout, ‘get off my phone!!!!!”


94 posted on 11/28/2015 2:10:14 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Finny

...All I had to see to understand that Trump is out of the running for my own vote was his explanation as to why McCain was only a war hero “because he was captured,” and wasn’t therefore really a war hero. I was stunned, shocked ... and enlightened. Cruz is absolutely the only guy in the race worth voting for...

What makes you think McCain was a war hero?


95 posted on 11/28/2015 2:12:44 PM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Sun
“Cruz is a once-in-a-generation candidate. Why settle for second best?”

DITTO!

Double DITTO!!

96 posted on 11/28/2015 2:16:21 PM PST by pollywog ( " O thou who changest not....ABIDE with me")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Cruz is a once-in-a-generation candidate.

Exactly.

97 posted on 11/28/2015 2:20:00 PM PST by FourPeas (Tone matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2; Aria
I guess you have never been in real estate development. Its all about persuasion. Getting permits, dealing with unions, negotiating contracts, dealing with inspectors. Its never ending schmooze and a lot of it with govt.

All the things that made America great.

The Founding Fathers were great schmoozers! Who knew!

98 posted on 11/28/2015 2:21:42 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: stanne
Trust Wikipedia at your own risk. My screaming leftist friend (a very close one, has been for more than 25 years) is so enamored of Wikipedia that it's his homepage. If wiki says it's so, them it's so. Wiki always supports his narrative.

FOUR billion would be the dif between Trump's claim and/or Wikipedia source and the 2015 billionaires list linked. MORE THAN DOUBLE a diff in the claim.

The kind of folks who trust Wikipedia, trust Trump, apparently.

Wikipedia may be okay with you on this forum -- but it's OUT for me on any forum except if it's a paid gig and I'm really desperate and it's only cotton-candy info that doesn't matter anyway. But to really on Wikipedia for really important info -- bad idea. Beware.

99 posted on 11/28/2015 2:36:42 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Duchess47
Because he put his life on the line for his country.

Do you think that the guys who were in the Bataan Death March weren't war heroes?

100 posted on 11/28/2015 2:37:36 PM PST by Finny (Voting "against" is a wish. Be ready to own what you vote for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson