Skip to comments.
Fit to print? NY Times smears GOP 'bigotry,' 'insanity'
Washington Examiner ^
| 11/26/15
| Pete Kasperowicz
Posted on 11/26/2015 7:03:08 PM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: markomalley
The NY Slimes and everyone who works there can KMA! Happy Thanksgiving, NYT!
2
posted on
11/26/2015 7:07:50 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
(Who is fact checking the state controlled, leftwing media's fact checkers?)
To: markomalley
may the ghost of Timothy McVeigh visit the Old Grey Lady
To: markomalley
New York Times?
Who seriously reads it?
They’re out of touch with country.
The GOP candidate whose position - as in Jeb Bush - echoes their open borders view, is polling only 5%!
Bernie Sanders will never be the Democratic nominee.
4
posted on
11/26/2015 7:10:32 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: markomalley
Note to the Left: Thats’s what’s called saving your nation and protecting them from foreign invaders. Maybe if they shared some of their own money instead of ours and had to work for it they’d get it.
To: goldstategop
Bernie Sanders will never be the Democratic nominee.His sudden death will be a tragedy.
To: markomalley
The New York times has gotten into gutter politics early in the campaign. They are really smearing the mud around.
To: markomalley
8
posted on
11/26/2015 7:17:46 PM PST
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: Parley Baer
9
posted on
11/26/2015 7:19:25 PM PST
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: Parley Baer
As Trump said, they’re more obsessed with attacking him than they are with keeping their failing business afloat.
He gives a rats’ ass what they think about him.
10
posted on
11/26/2015 7:21:25 PM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
Doubtful the collective IQ at NYT is noteworthy.
11
posted on
11/26/2015 7:22:25 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: goldstategop
New York Times? Who seriously reads it?
You Mean other than avians?
12
posted on
11/26/2015 7:22:45 PM PST
by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: markomalley
13
posted on
11/26/2015 7:25:26 PM PST
by
Williams
(Dear God, please save us from the Democrats. And the Republicans.)
To: LeoWindhorse
The Old Grey Lady has reached the point of dementia.
To: markomalley
The NY Slime is not fit to print or even use to line the blooming Bird cage. of a
15
posted on
11/26/2015 7:29:19 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
To: FlingWingFlyer
16
posted on
11/26/2015 7:32:49 PM PST
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: markomalley
trail of tears comparison does not apply to illegal mexcans being sent back to their country violating our immigration laws.
reality disconnect == jackass liberals
17
posted on
11/26/2015 7:50:23 PM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: markomalley
It should forever be referred to as the Mexican New York Times by dint of its ownership and agenda.
Nativism and bigotry are not synonymous or even complementary. Nativism is a more sinister sounding term for nationalism ie patriotism. It’s no surprise that Marxists dislike patriotism but it’s hardly the evil they describe.
As for ‘bigotry,’ are Latino Americans bigots because they don’t want a flood of Third World detritus? Are black Americans bigots because they don’t want Muslim Somalis fomenting terrorism?
Bigot is now an acronym:
Boohoo
I
Got
Out
Thought
18
posted on
11/26/2015 8:01:39 PM PST
by
relictele
(Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends)
To: markomalley
The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far, itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word.
National differences and antagonism between peoples are daily more and more vanishing, owing to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the conditions of life corresponding thereto. The supremacy of the proletariat will cause them to vanish still faster. United action, of the leading civilised countries at least, is one of the first conditions for the emancipation of the proletariat.
In proportion as the exploitation of one individual by another will also be put an end to, the exploitation of one nation by another will also be put an end to. In proportion as the antagonism between classes within the nation vanishes, the hostility of one nation to another will come to an end.
Karl Marx, "The Communist Manifesto"
19
posted on
11/26/2015 8:08:18 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
To: Sasparilla
I think there needs to be two Americas. one for them, and one for us. I know that was tried in the past and it didn’t work out so well. But perhaps it’s time to give it another shot..... One thing is for sure, I do not want to live in their country, & I do not want them living in mine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson