[erlayman]

“That was a prime site for river crossings,” he explained the Times. “So, if people are crossing the river, and you happen to be in a civil war, I would say that people were shot—a lot of them. ...Write your story the way you want to write it. You don’t have to talk to anybody. It doesn’t make any difference. But many people were shot. It makes sense.”

He is running for president for heaven’s sake and needs to be able to present at least a token offer an evidence to corroborate a historical claim of such supposed major import.

[mkjessup]

We’ll put you down as agreeing with the New York Times.

(hint: that ain’t nothin’ to be proud of)

[itsahoot]

He is running for president for heaven’s sake and needs to be able to present at least a token offer an evidence to corroborate a historical claim of such supposed major import.

Well of course he should. The fact that it doesn't matter to his supporters is what chaps you. Keep trying though something is bound to make a difference sooner or later.