Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Isara

I am of the opinion that the President of the United States should be born on American soil to two American citizens.

Obviously, I am in a minority.

I think it is a very sad commentary on our country and our citizens that we actively support by legal arguments and the meaning of what “is” is, someone who was born in a foreign country (yes, Canada is a foreign country) of only one American citizen, and who was a citizen of said foreign country until a couple of years ago.

Using the argument of Obama is really stretching. I don’t think he was/is eligible by virtue of the fact that his father was not an American no matter where he was born.

I also don’t think Jindal and Rubio are eligible by virtue of the fact that they are anchor babies.

Of course, we could continue this road until we end up with a president who is the son of the Chinese president, born here on vacation.

I am horrified that “conservatives” think this is all okay because it’s their guy. Same logic the Democrats used when it was their guy.


68 posted on 11/26/2015 7:46:16 AM PST by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Duchess47

Bump!


70 posted on 11/26/2015 11:52:45 AM PST by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied, Otto Von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson