Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
If that is the source of "Natural Born" then why weren't slaves citizens?

What makes you think they weren't?

Why did we have to pass a law (the 14th amendment) if that was already the law?

Because of the Scott v. Sandford ruling.

42 posted on 11/25/2015 2:52:36 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
If that is the source of "Natural Born" then why weren't slaves citizens?

What makes you think they weren't?

I should bother to answer such a stupid question? Because holding citizens would be illegal.

Why did we have to pass a law (the 14th amendment) if that was already the law?

Because of the Scott v. Sandford ruling.

To argue that the 14th was necessary to repeal Scott v. Sandford is to argue that the decision was legitimate in the first place.

An Amendment is only needed to change things when the law needs to be changed.

64 posted on 11/26/2015 7:05:23 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson