Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

DD, these comments are not personally directed at you.

But this is a question I have.

How can a 14th Amendment anchor baby be equivalent to a natural born citizen?

When Rubio was born, what jurisdiction was he subject to?

The United States or Cuba?

Which jurisdiction were his parents subject to?

Natural born has a meaning, and Rubio does not fit it.

He did not even have one American parent.

Being born here makes him a native born citizen, but not a natural born citizen.

As for definitions in the Constitution, the term Letters of Marque is not defined either. But we know the meaning.


22 posted on 11/25/2015 10:53:01 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: exit82
When Rubio was born, what jurisdiction was he subject to?

U.S. Same for his parents.

Being born here makes him a native born citizen, but not a natural born citizen.

Where does the Constitution mention "native-born"? It mentions natural-born and naturalized and that's it.

24 posted on 11/25/2015 11:10:45 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson