Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

How does Rubio fit any definition of natural born citizen?

The 14th Amendment does not change the term, and anchor babies are not in the Amendment.

Rubio would have the least ability to prove eligibility.

Cruz has an American citizen mother—that alone qualifies him.


16 posted on 11/25/2015 10:33:57 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: exit82
The 14th Amendment does not change the term, and anchor babies are not in the Amendment.

Nothing in the Constitution defines the term either. Rubio is a natural born citizen because he was born here.

21 posted on 11/25/2015 10:44:57 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: exit82

It is evident from the historical evidence surrounding the NBC issue that the purpose of Article II Sec. I clause 5 was to minimize the likelihood of undue foreign influence on the office of the presidency, PARTICULARLY from a Father owing allegiance to a foreign sovereign. Cuba had a legal claim on Cruz’s allegiance from his birth thru his father, then still a Cuban citizen; no matter how difficult it may have been for them to enforce it. He is a US citizen by a STATUTE passed in 1953, not by virtue of natural law.

US citizenship did not transfer to a child thru the mother untill the passage of the Cable Act in 1934, quite a few years after the ratification of Article II of the constitution. EVERY ONE of the framers of the constitution was ineligible to assume the office of POTUS, save for the grandfather clause in Article II that allowed them to.

The founders relied upon the Emmerich De Vattelian definition from the Law of Nations for the definition of natural born citizen. SCOTUS cites the entire 212th paragraph from that tome to define NBC in their 1814 Venus merchantman decision. You see that definition again in Minor vs Happersett.

I LOVE Cruz. Intellectually and philosophically, he is almost a perfect presidential candidate. He is a patriot who loves his country and would probably be at least as great as Ronald Reagan. Despite that I believe in the rule of law as opposed to the cult of personality. There is NO WAY that I can regard Cruz as Article II eligible.

But if I MUST have an unconstitutional POTUS, let it be one who is otherwise good for the country as opposed to the Marxist usurper enemy alien combatant who currently infests the White Hut.


46 posted on 11/25/2015 3:11:08 PM PST by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson