Posted on 11/25/2015 7:58:55 AM PST by Timpanagos1
Fox News host Megyn Kelly paused a guest from commenting Tuesday night when she noticed an “extraordinary moment†occurring live on TV during coverage of protests against the Chicago Police Department.
“I just want to jump in. I just want to jump in as we are seeing an extraordinary moment,†she said. “Look what’s happening here.â€
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
.....cue Buffalo Springfield..................
this crap is just normal in Obama’s world
““It’s not a question of what his Constitutional rights are, it’s a question of what’s appropriate,†she quipped back.””
Did the Framers intend for such silent protests to be protected by the first amendment?
Is it legal to intimidate a police officer in a silent protest?
As I recall, the ‘guest’ was the useless horse’s ass, Richard Fowler.
I strongly suspect these various “protests”, both at colleges and on the street, are being orchestrated with the purpose of arousing the Af-Am vote for the 2016 general election, since otherwise their turnout to vote for an ancient, corrupt, white female wouldn’t be nearly as great as it has been for one who has their same skin color.
I strongly suspect these various “protestsâ€, both at colleges and on the street, are being orchestrated with the purpose of arousing the Af-Am vote for the 2016 general election,
...
I strongly suspect you’re right. I’m reminded of the lead protester in Missouri who is from a rich family. It’s all about money and power, not helping black people or anyone else outside the evil web of big government.
I don’t watch the witch anymore....she is full of B.S.
What was the guest’s problem with Meagan voicing her First Amendment Rights to object to the black protester who was silently intimidating the cop?
intimidation of a cop is a crime
Ding! Ding! Ding! We have a winner!
The "Black Lives Matter/Ferguson" rent-a-mob has also shifted to the Universities to fire up the stupid and easily manipulated college vote for the same reason. It's all so transparent, except for the target audience of their agitation. None so blind as those who will not see.
I saw this. He was violating the cop’s space. A normal person wouldn’t have put up with it.
“intimidation of a cop is a crime”
Yes, it was clear silent intimidation in part of a potentially violent protestor.
You’re being too kind when you call him a useless horse’s ass.
Good point
I saw this, such BS. I don't think the 'yout' would have been so brave if there were no cameras rolling at the time. He knew he was on national television at the time......real badass, that one.
I’ve noticed these protesters aren’t ghetto rats - they are either students or working class folks who, in my opinion, don’t live the “struggle” and never have, so they want to claim part of the oppression for themselves by speaking up about how hard their lives are.
I am pleased the cop was so calm. One of the talking heads is saying it is the kids right to silently protest....sure, but not staring in someone’s face.
Do that in another other situaion and you get rightfully arrested.
You are probably right.
If he had looked at a Chicago cop in that manner without TV or Dash cameras present, it would be a far different story.
Any GOP candidate who uses that term and promises to oppose it will see his poll #s rise 10 points. (Well, almost any ... :^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.