Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hostage
Media scum tried this trick several months ago to promote Ted over Donald. They were wishfully thinking that Ted would be easier to take down than Donald if only they could first get Ted to take down Donald.

You are going to need to get off the drugs.
# 1. Lamestream media never promoted Ted Cruz over Donald Trump. Lamestreams never promoted Ted Cruz. Period.
# 2. Lamestreams were attacking Ted Cruz long before Donald Trump appeared on the scene.

153 posted on 11/25/2015 1:03:20 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: SmokingJoe

You’re pretty dense aren’t you?

Check my history. I have been one of the strongest and most consistent defenders of Ted Cruz on FR.

I saw with my eyes the print of media scumbags writing that they wished Ted Cruz would win because he was easier to take down. That’s a fact. Their attempt died after a few days. Now you get your head straight and show respect to persons that know better than you.

“In just about any other year, Mr. Cruz would be the worst-case scenario for the party’s establishment. But compared with the likes of Mr. Trump and Mr. Carson, he seems reasonable and conventional. That might let him become a candidate the party could grudgingly accept.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/05/upshot/ted-cruz-has-a-chance-to-win-heres-the-path.html?_r=0

Now read further and note that this NY Times scumbag writer writes that Cruz has no chance to win nationally. In other words, in his view and in the view of his homosexual editors, Cruz is to be used to take Trump down or to slow him down.


159 posted on 11/25/2015 1:40:28 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson