Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Planes Left ISIS Fuel Tankers Unharmed Because 'They Ran Out of Ammunition'
CNS ^ | November 24, 2015 | Susan Jones

Posted on 11/24/2015 10:56:16 AM PST by xzins

The U.S. military conducted a second wave of attacks on (parked) ISIS oil tankers in Syria on Sunday, Nov. 22, but the attack fell short of its goal:

"The goal was to destroy every truck there. They ran out of ammunition before they were able to do that. But the desire was to destroy every single truck there," said Army Col. Steven Warren, the spokesman for the U.S.-led coaltion fighting ISIS.

At a news briefing on Tuesday, Warren played video of the ISIS fuel tankers being bombed or shot with machine gun fire from the air. Warren said all the trucks were targeted, but the video just shows "the good shots that you'd like."

As was the case with an earlier U.S. strike on ISIS fuel tankers, the Americans dropped leaflets warning the truck drivers that an attack was coming, so the tankers were not moving.

Warren called the airstrikes "another example of the type of accuracy that we're capable of here in the coalition."

A total of 283 fuel trucks were destroyed by American planes on Sunday: "A bomb would have been from an A-10, and then when you saw the guns, you know, the machine gun fire, that could either have been an A-10 or AC-130 Spectre Gunship."

"It's not a movie where you kind of fly along and just strafe, and you know, the trucks blow up. No, it's -- they struck each truck, or groups of two or three trucks. It is a machine gun, so there is a certain area aspect to it, right? You know, the gunfire isn't laser guided...So it's individual strike a truck, or two or three trucks; move to the next batch, strike them; move, strike; move, strike.

"So the goal was to destroy every truck there. They ran out of ammunition before they were able to do that. But the desire was to destroy every single truck there."

Combined with an earlier U.S. strike on ISIS fuel tankers, the U.S. military has now destroyed 399 of them, but Warren would not say how many are left: "I'm not going to tell you the total number of trucks out there...but we've still got a long way to go on trucks," he said.

Warren also disputed Russia's recent claim that it had attacked and destroyed 500 ISIS fuel tankers in the "same general region" last week.

"From what we saw, the battle damage assessment they issued seemed to be exaggerated. More than likely the Russian attacks did not produce the results that they claimed it produced."

Warren said the U.S. estimates that Russia destroyed only around 100 tankers.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airstrikes; isis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: smokingfrog

...Why don’t they destroy the fuel source?...

Too much for Obama


21 posted on 11/24/2015 11:10:49 AM PST by Sasparilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Methinks Barack is trying to take credit for the thousand of Russian sorties that destroyed tank trucks.

Russian jets attach fuel trucks

Youtube:

Combat Cam: Russian jets destroy ISIS oil refinery & tanker trucks in Syria

We never, ever see any war porn from Obama's War on Terrorism!

22 posted on 11/24/2015 11:12:40 AM PST by TexasCajun (#BlackViolenceMatters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“OK, Barney. You can have one bullet. But you have to keep it in your pocket.” Sheriff Andy Obama


23 posted on 11/24/2015 11:12:53 AM PST by pabianice (LINE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So we aren’t using cluster bombs during the strafing runs...

1 truck = 1 bomb???


24 posted on 11/24/2015 11:14:41 AM PST by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xzins

But they had plenty of leaflets.


25 posted on 11/24/2015 11:14:53 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

There’s also such a thing as rearming. Have to wonder why that wasn’t planned for. Maybe the distance to the targets precluded doing that.


26 posted on 11/24/2015 11:15:30 AM PST by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not accomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: xzins
“The, uh, president didn't tell us to stand down....um...
We Ran Out of Ammunition!

Yeah, that's the ticket!
Ahh....Morgan Fairchild handed me the message personally.

“Honest... I ran out of ammunition. I... I had a flat tire. I didn't have enough money for cab fare. My uniform didn't come back from the cleaners. An old friend came in from out of town. Someone stole my jeep. There was an earthquake. A terrible flood. Locusts!”

27 posted on 11/24/2015 11:16:01 AM PST by PATRIOT1876 (The only crimes that are 100% preventable are those committed by illegal aliens)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

Blues Brothers


28 posted on 11/24/2015 11:16:58 AM PST by xzins (HAVE YOU DONATED TO THE FREEPATHON? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Like Andy giving Barney only one round for his revolver.

Tell me again which side obama and the US military is backing?


29 posted on 11/24/2015 11:16:58 AM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

You know that this story is another Administration lie.Our planes couldn’t destroy those tankers because they ran out of ammunition.

I’m sure they could have could have destroyed all of those trucks by flying additional sorties until there were no trucks left.

Obama thinks he’s Lyndon Johnson and he’s telling our pilots they can’t bomb any additional trucks without his permission.


30 posted on 11/24/2015 11:17:11 AM PST by puppypusher ( The World is going to the dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Our Terrorist in Chief gave warning to the drivers and then didn't finish the job. And he calls off 75% of the missions. Proof positive, again, which side he's on.


31 posted on 11/24/2015 11:18:05 AM PST by bgill ( CDC site, "we still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

283 tankers destroyed is still pretty impressive. Would like to know how many A-10s were involved, and how many sorties, which would give a good indication of how much ammo was expended per truck. There is such a thing as running out of ammo before targets, even for the A-10.

I recall pretty vividly the images of the “Highway of Death” during the Iraqi retreat from Kuwait, which was a maximum effort by several squadrons, using area weapons (cluster munitions) rather than the en vogue GBUs. In addition to guns.


32 posted on 11/24/2015 11:19:17 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I’m calling B.S.

Everyone knows Putin is doing this. There is a lot of videos of it, and even ISIS admits it.

So along comes the Administration pretending they are doing all of this.

Keep in mind we were supposedly doing this for over 15 months before Putin came into Syria. We NEVER saw anything like this before.


33 posted on 11/24/2015 11:19:21 AM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“Why’d you shoot him 44 times?”

“Ran outta ammo.”


34 posted on 11/24/2015 11:19:29 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
A military spokesman calling an A-10s primary weapon a “machine gun”. WTF?

My reaction, too.

35 posted on 11/24/2015 11:20:33 AM PST by matt1234 (Note to GOPe lurkers: I and thousands like me will NEVER vote for Jeb Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Sorry bout the dupe post. Set my phone down and when I picked it up again it was still on the posting screen.


36 posted on 11/24/2015 11:22:07 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: xzins

“We ran out of ammo????”

I see that as a failure of the Commander in Chief.


37 posted on 11/24/2015 11:24:02 AM PST by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Post of the Day!!


38 posted on 11/24/2015 11:24:30 AM PST by sparklite2 (Islam = all bathwater, no baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PATRIOT1876

You forgot “I broke the heel of my shoe off”, LOL.


39 posted on 11/24/2015 11:25:07 AM PST by rhoda_penmark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$
"machine gun" ....


40 posted on 11/24/2015 11:25:40 AM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson