Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Arthur McGowan
You are, of course, aware that these are the precise reasons the Church has always required Denial of Communion to persons living publicly in a state of adultery.

So when Rudy Giuliani received communion at a mass celebrated by Pope Benedict, did His Holiness publicly stumble?

21 posted on 11/23/2015 4:00:08 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

No, because Benedict never SAID that pro-aborts may receive Communion. In fact, he stated the opposite, more than once.

Did Benedict know Giuliani by sight? Possibly, but not certainly.

Did Giuliani receive from the Pope? Probably not. Benedict usually did NOT distribute Communion at his Masses.

Giuliani already had an understanding with Cardinal Egan that he would not receive Communion, based on the fact that Giuliani was living with either a shack-up or a second wife—I don’t remember which, and it doesn’t matter.

Nice try. But no, the situation you cite is nothing like Donohue’s. Donohue has given formal, conscious approval to the mortal sin of giving Communion to pro-aborts.

Notice how Donohue tries to blur the issue by referring, not to “pro-abortion” politicians, but “liberal” politicians—implying that Voris and other “right-wing nuts” think people should be denied Communion for being LIBERALS.


22 posted on 11/23/2015 4:34:04 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson