Where is the problem?
You can’t have a New World Order for the benefit of big business when this kind of conflict is going on and it needs to be contained and its spread ‘prevented’ so there can be ‘prosperity’ in the world.
Barack Obama’s line about the IS being ‘contained’ fits that template he and other leaders present for public consumption.
Hollande of France, Cameron of the UK and Merkel of Germany and the list goes on want to move onto more important aspects of building the NWO like global warming (”climate change”).
OK, that’s their strategy, and it’s not a bad one if you don’t give a hoot about your co-religionists. So the wise writer thinks that the West can outfox the Muslims by sitting back and taking it?
Would Hitler have lost his edge if everyone else turned the other cheek?
The EU is suffering the consequences of its flawed ideology. In its post Christian, neo pagan era, it has adopted the Marxist concept of one world/no borders, the “commonality” of man. It has ceased to defend its own borders or preserve its endemic culture. However they are painfully learning that differences do matter. In the case of Islam basic definitions and concepts are fundamentally different to those commonly held by a Westerner. “Peace” can only come to a Muslim when those around him either submit to Islam or are dead or soundly subjugated. The is no “tolerance” of unbelievers. The EU is beginning to comprehend the catastrophe their flawed ideology has made real. Hopefully the Republican Party will continue to resist open borders and seek to defend and preserve American culture.
Why don't these peaceful muslim communities take care of the crazies in their midst?
This squishy article meanders all over the place. The underlying theme I discern is essentially “It is hopeless to fight jihadists, so you better abandon Christianity and convert to Islam. We’ll all be happier and get along fine once we are all Muslims.”