Posted on 11/15/2015 5:14:38 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee
Roughly 180 cities nationwide will receive a minimum of 10, 000 “Syrian refugees,†who are mostly neither Syrian nor refugees, and not “properly vetted.†Additionally, ten thousand is a misleading number—as it excludes an additional eight people each refugee is allowed to bring. In this way, ten thousand actually translates to 90,000.
http://constitution.com/100000-refugees-to-arrive-in-180-american-cities/#!
“Texas: Abilene, Amarillo, Austin, Corpus Christi, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio”
Match up that list with the one Isis said they would hit....
These three are on both lists:
Abilene
San Antonio
Dallas(Wylie)
The list in texas that isis said they would hit
Texas: Abilene, New Braunfels, San Antonio, Wyle, Fort Hood, Bedford, Killeen
This administration has committed to taking in 185,000 Syrian “refugees” over the next 2 years.Obama assures that they will not be dangerous because they will be the most “vetted” immigrants in history.The FBI says they have no fingerprint records or criminal records to review on these folks because they are “fleeing” Assad, whose government would have records. So how are they vetted? Sounds like the blindness of another we will not know what’s in it until we pass it moment.
Earlier this year, Isis itself announced it was going to do this.
Is there a link for these photos or did you have to load them individually?
“Syrians” are already here:
“Is that really a pic from New Orleans?”
No, it is a picture from Europe, that has been circulating for a few days, with some exaggerated stories about New Orleans.
Great graphic in a great thread.
Taqiyyah and/or truth after having swept it aside completely with the “charter of negative liberties” phrase while the “checks and balances” aren’t tiggered because secular totalitarians posing as “representatives” have a lock on the interconnected 535 piece jigsaw puzzle called Congress. Oh, and “states rights”/ people (10th) have been shackled long ago by this FEDGOV leviathan.
From long ago -
If it has its defects, it is said, they can be best amended when they are experienced. But remember, when the people once part with power, they can seldom or never resume it again but by force. Many instances can be produced in which the people have voluntarily increased the powers of their rulers; but few, if any, in which rulers have willingly abridged their authority. This is a sufficient reason to induce you to be careful, in the first instance, how you deposit the powers of government.
How far the clause in the 8th section of the 1st article may operate to do away all idea of confederated states, and to effect an entire consolidation of the whole into one general government, it is impossible to say. The powers given by this article are very general and comprehensive, and it may receive a construction to justify the passing almost any law. A power to make all laws, which shall be necessary and proper, for carrying into execution, all powers vested by the constitution in the government of the United States, or any department or officer thereof, is a power very comprehensive and definite [indefinite?], and may, for ought I know, be exercised in a such manner as entirely to abolish the state legislatures. Suppose the legislature of a state should pass a law to raise money to support their government and pay the state debt, may the Congress repeal this law, because it may prevent the collection of a tax which they may think proper and necessary to lay, to provide for the general welfare of the United States? For all laws made, in pursuance of this constitution, are the supreme lay of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the constitution or laws of the different states to the contrary notwithstanding.  By such a law, the government of a particular state might be overturned at one stroke, and thereby be deprived of every means of its support.
It is not meant, by stating this case, to insinuate that the constitution would warrant a law of this kind; or unnecessarily to alarm the fears of the people, by suggesting, that the federal legislature would be more likely to pass the limits assigned them by the constitution, than that of an individual state, further than they are less responsible to the people. But what is meant is, that the legislature of the United States are vested with the great and uncontroulable powers, of laying and collecting taxes, duties, imposts, and excises; of regulating trade, raising and supporting armies, organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia, instituting courts, and other general powers. And are by this clause invested with the power of making all laws, proper and necessary, for carrying all these into execution; and they may so exercise this power as entirely to annihilate all the state governments, and reduce this country to one single government. And if they may do it, it is pretty certain they will; for it will be found that the power retained by individual states, small as it is, will be a clog upon the wheels of the government of the United States; the latter therefore will be naturally inclined to remove it out of the way. Besides, it is a truth confirmed by the unerring experience of ages, that every man, and every body of men, invested with power, are ever disposed to increase it, and to acquire a superiority over every thing that stands in their way. This disposition, which is implanted in human nature, will operate in the federal legislature to lessen and ultimately to subvert the state authority, and having such advantages, will most certainly succeed, if the federal government succeeds at all. It must be very evident then, that what this constitution wants of being a complete consolidation of the several parts of the union into one complete government, possessed of perfect legislative, judicial, and executive powers, to all intents and purposes, it will necessarily acquire in its exercise and operation.
Let us now proceed to enquire, as I at first proposed, whether it be best the thirteen United States should be reduced to one great republic, or not? It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one; that it should be so framed as to secure the liberty of the citizens of America, and such an one as to admit of a full, fair, and equal representation of the people. The question then will be, whether a government thus constituted, and founded on such principles, is practicable, and can be exercised over the whole United States, reduced into one state?
Anti-federalist: Brutus #1
—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
As far as I know the answer is yes.
Here is where I found the photo:
https://theconservativetreehouse.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/jihad-in-new-orleans.jpg?w=640&h=342
There are many articles on the net regarding the entry of Syrian "refugees" in the US.
Here is one from the hated NY Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/21/us/where-syrian-refugees-are-in-the-united-states.html
Here is mention of it on Allen West's blog:
http://www.allenbwest.com/2015/11/syrian-refugees-now-arriving-in-this-u-s-city/
Also similar articles have been posted on Free Republic.
Here are a few:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3356525/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3360674/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3360626/posts
The oligarchy that seeks the demise of the Republic is locating the jihadis in conservative areas, for the purpose of division and chaos. Are the jihadis smart enough to see the way they are being used, and thus they will do their jihadi ditties in liberal enclaves where gun free zones predominate the landscape. we shall see ... someone is directing this invasion and funding the invaders ... L4B knows the scorecard which we the people are not allowed to see.
Regrouping, not defeated.
I loaded them individually. Goggle images of war refugees online and see for yourself.
will put in an email and share with others....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.