Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$1.7 Mil to Ease Prison Transition, Public Housing told not to Reject Criminals
Judicial Watch ^ | 11/12/15

Posted on 11/12/2015 7:21:26 PM PST by markomalley

Coinciding with the mass release of federal inmates, the Obama administration is spending $1.7 million on a “re-entry program” to ease the transition from prison and ordering public housing facilities not to reject tenants with criminal records.

The goal is to reduce barriers to public housing, employment and educational opportunities by promoting rehabilitation and reintegration for the formerly incarcerated, the feds explain in an announcement. A key component of the program is a joint venture between the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to help public housing residents expunge or seal their criminal records. The administration considers these “Americans who’ve paid their debt to society” and need the government’s help to “rehabilitate and reintegrate back into their communities.”

A criminal record severely limits a person’s ability to seek higher education, find good employment, qualify for credit and secure affordable housing, the administration states in its announcement. This creates unnecessary barriers to economic opportunity and productivity for the convicts after they leave jail and President Obama is determined to ensure those returning from prison become “productive, law-abiding citizens.” His Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, says the DOJ is “committed to giving formerly incarcerated individuals the tools they need to become productive members of society.”

For starters, the cons must find a place to live after getting released from jail so the administration has issued updated rules for taxpayer-subsidized housing essentially prohibiting the exclusion of tenants who have been arrested or criminally convicted. “…arrest records may not be the basis for denying admission, terminating assistance or evicting tenants…,” the new rules say, adding that HUD does not require the adoption or enforcement of “one-strike rules that deny admission to anyone with a criminal record or that require automatic eviction any time a household member engages in criminal activity in violation of their lease.” The message from the administration to federally-assisted housing facilities appears to be to condone criminal behavior.

This is part of Obama’s broader effort to reform the nation’s criminal justice system as a way of ending racial discrimination. Back in 2010 the president signed a measure that for the first time in decades relaxed drug-crime sentences he claimed discriminated against poor and minority offenders. This severely weakened a decades-old law enacted during the infamous crack cocaine epidemic that ravaged urban communities nationwide in the 1980s. As part of the movement the U.S. Sentencing Commission lowered maximum sentences for drug offenders and made it retroactive.

This month the administration began releasing 6,000 drug convicts it claims are “non-violent” offenders whose sentences were too long under the old guidelines. News reports have already surfaced contradicting the administration’s assessment that the newly released convicts are not violent. Among them is the leader of a multi-million dollar operation that smuggled drugs from Canada to Maine. Prosecutors refer to the 29-year-old con as a “drug kingpin” who was one of “America’s Most Wanted.”

Shortly before the administration’s mass release of drug convicts, federal prosecutors warned that drug trafficking is inherently violent and therefore the phrase “non-violent drug offenders” is a misnomer. The nation’s prosecutors also cautioned that reducing prison sentences for drug offenders will weaken their ability to bring dangerous drug traffickers to justice.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: criminals; housing; hud

1 posted on 11/12/2015 7:21:26 PM PST by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Coinciding with the mass release of federal inmates, the Obama administration is spending $1.7 million on a “re-entry program” to ease the transition from prison and ordering public housing facilities not to reject tenants with criminal records.

Does that include former Presidents with criminal records?

2 posted on 11/12/2015 7:26:12 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The Bush family needs to just go away. The Clinton family needs just to go to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Dear current public housing residents,

BOHICA

Love, Øbama

3 posted on 11/12/2015 7:26:31 PM PST by NonValueAdded (In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Ever wondered why public housing is like living in a war zone?


4 posted on 11/12/2015 7:29:46 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

I’ve been in some nice public housing. It was a bit rough there though. Of course this was when I lived in lilly white Nebraska.


5 posted on 11/12/2015 7:33:32 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

They are clutching at straws looking for a solution to our “untouchables caste”; the costs of this growing, unemployable, permanent underclass are skyrocketing as it outpaces the ability of Planned Parenthood’s extermination plan to deal with them.


6 posted on 11/12/2015 7:51:30 PM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; Liz

There is that HUD plan....


7 posted on 11/12/2015 7:59:28 PM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

DW and I own what could be described a medium rentals. Definitely not low-end, but not high end. sort of lower middle class and maybe upper lower class.

Some of the tenants (maybe 15%) are on various kinds of housing assistance.

Landlords always have some percentage of problem tenants, but our experience has been that more than 50% of the problems come from the 15% of the tenants who are on housing assistance. Most of the rest of the problems come from normal people who want to move a relative who just got out of prison or jail in. In almost every case, the relative starts selling drugs, and attracting undesirable people at all hours of the night. If we let this get out of hand, it drives away the good tenants, who have to get up in the morning to go to a job.

This is not just theoretical, hearsay stuff. We put up security cameras a while ago and we have movies of the 3 AM drug deals in the parking lots.

The way to reduce crime is to get rid of the criminals. Every cop in our little town knows this and is supportive. But, Obama is too dumb to see it...


8 posted on 11/12/2015 11:06:44 PM PST by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Where the hell did Obama think the criminals came from????
Answer: Public housing.


9 posted on 11/13/2015 4:12:22 AM PST by DH (Once the tainted finger of government touches anything the rot begins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave

I understand the issues you describe, but it is not stupidity or ignorance on Obama’s part; the left knows that this situation is untenable (where so many people permanently live outside of civilization). They aren’t just unproductive in terms of the state; they are a menace to everyone else (particularly poor populations).


10 posted on 11/13/2015 4:18:55 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
...the new rules say, adding that HUD does not require the adoption or enforcement of “one-strike rules that deny admission to anyone with a criminal record or that require automatic eviction any time a household member engages in criminal activity in violation of their lease.

Denying admission on the basis of a criminal record is one issue, and a complex one. Not all convictions are the same. Not all convicts are the same. Long-ago convictions make the first part of this edict debatable.

But current behavior that violates the legal contract for housing is entirely different - it recognizes not a past act, but a current decision to break the law.

The administration is condoning illegal activity.

11 posted on 11/13/2015 4:27:15 AM PST by MortMan (I am offended by those who believe they have a right not to be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

just another piece in the obama mosaic to destroy America
why is he not IMPEACHED yet...???


12 posted on 11/13/2015 6:50:09 AM PST by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson