Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mizzou Finally Releases Poop Swastika Police Report
The Federalist ^ | 11/12/15 | Sean Davis

Posted on 11/12/2015 7:39:22 AM PST by Sopater

The University of Missouri released a police report Wednesday night that was prepared following a complaint that a swastika made of poop was found in a dormitory bathroom at the university in late October.

The police report was obtained by the Daily Caller’s Chuck Ross.

Many questions remain about a swastika scrawled in feces in a bathroom at a residence hall on the University of Missouri last month. But a police report obtained by The Daily Caller on Wednesday does show that a university police officer did observe the scrawling.

The so-called poop swastika has been the subject of intense speculation in recent days. University police and other school officials and staffers have declined to provide any information on who observed the scrawling, whether police saw it and whether it was photographed.

The police report, which can be read in full here, shows that an officer responded to a vandalism complaint at Gateway Hall, a Mizzou dormitory, at 2:12 a.m. on October 24, 2015.

“I noticed there was a swastika drawn on the wall by someone using feces,” the responding officer wrote in the report. “There was also feces on the floor located by the entry way to the restroom.”

The bulk of the officer’s report is redacted. No suspects are listed, and no motivations for the fecal display are listed in the police report. The report does not include any photographic evidence of the poop swastika. Although the initial incident occurred in the early morning hours of October 24, the police report was not prepared and filed until the evening of October 29. An official investigator was assigned to the case on October 26, according to the report.

On Tuesday evening, a woman who claims to work for the university’s custodial services division stated in the comments section of a Fox Sports article that the poop swastika incident did happen as reported.

“I am a custodian for the MU residence halls,” she wrote in a comment to the article. “The [poop swastika] did happen.” She also posted on her Facebook page, which lists her employer as the University of Missouri Residential Life division, that “[a]s a custodian that works in the dorms I can confirm that the ‘poopswastika’ happened.”

The Federalist repeatedly requested records from the University of Missouri pertaining to the poop swastika, but university officials refused to respond to the inquiries. An official public records request by The Federalist, which was filed with the university’s records custodian on Tuesday morning, received no response. Repeated requests over multiple days for records and information from the university’s public relations division, its custodial services division, and its residential life division were ignored as well.

When The Federalist contacted the residential custodial services division Wednesday morning, a staffer directed all inquiries about the poop swastika incident to the university’s public relations division, which did not respond to repeated requests for comment or clarification.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: education; mizzou; racism; swastika
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Sopater

When I was a kid swastikas were common on bathroom walls, even here in liberal California. I never suspected the artists were actual nazis - I always assumed they just thought it looked cool & it was easy to draw.


21 posted on 11/12/2015 8:13:32 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

another “Dan Blatjerism?”


22 posted on 11/12/2015 8:14:43 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“Dan Blatherism”


23 posted on 11/12/2015 8:17:47 AM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

So why is it that the black students are all up in arms but not the school’s Jewish students?


24 posted on 11/12/2015 8:25:23 AM PST by Timber Rattler ("To hold a pen is to be at war." --Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Stupid Missouri cops! Can't catch me!!!


25 posted on 11/12/2015 8:33:18 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama = ISIS Fanboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Did they take a sample to do a DNA test on it?


26 posted on 11/12/2015 9:03:45 AM PST by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
The 10/29/ date shows on the report a “print date/time” - not sure how that equates to prep & file date.

What is interesting is that this was reported supposedly 12 minutes after it happened ?

Sure a lot of fuss for an inactive case. “

I'm still not sure why blacks are offended by a feces swastika.
Shouldn't the Jews and the Skinheads be the ones who should be offended ? P

27 posted on 11/12/2015 9:05:24 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo Smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

If somebody drew a cross in poop I would think they were mocking Christ.

Why is it assumed that a Nazi sympathizer would draw a swastika in poop? I would think that would be the work of somebody who hates/mocks Nazism.

And if Blacks are going to identify as victims of Nazism then they should be blasting Planned Parenthood which was founded by Margaret SAnger, the white supremacist colleague of Hitler’s crew who said that Blacks were so stupid that if you got a charismatic Black preacher to tell them it was their “right”, they would commit self-genocide through abortion. She said her way of eliminating “undesireables” would be more effective than Hitler’s. Which of these Black protesters are willing to prove her wrong?


28 posted on 11/12/2015 9:06:04 AM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All


Just A Reminder
Please Don't Forget
To Donate To FR
This Quarter

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

29 posted on 11/12/2015 9:13:11 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: musicman

Obviously as this situation develops, something stinks.


30 posted on 11/12/2015 9:21:36 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

The last page of the police report contains a large blacked-out area. That was either a tribute to Black Lives Matter, or it may contain a redacted photo.


31 posted on 11/12/2015 9:22:45 AM PST by RightFighter (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

I would not be a bit surprised if a black student did this.


32 posted on 11/12/2015 9:30:26 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Isn’t drawing a symbol in feces a statement against that symbol?

When an image of Jesus Christ was submerged in urine, no one mistook it as a pro-Christian statement.


33 posted on 11/12/2015 9:32:36 AM PST by joshua c (Please dont feed the liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
What is interesting is that this was reported supposedly 12 minutes after it happened ?

The report says that the incident occurred "from" 12:30am "through" 2:00am, and then was reported at 2:12am. My guess is that means that someone was in the bathroom at 12:30 and did not see the swastika, then someone else went in at 2:00 and saw it (meaning that it happened at some point between 12:30 and 2:00), and then the officer arrived at 2:12 (at which point the incident was officially "reported").

34 posted on 11/12/2015 10:09:00 AM PST by dem bums
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

Note that a listed offense on the form includes “anti-reproductive rights crime.”


35 posted on 11/12/2015 10:13:22 AM PST by Controlling Legal Authority (Author of "Are You Ready to Adopt?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dem bums

i see it now. thanx


36 posted on 11/12/2015 10:37:13 AM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo Smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Report conveniently backdated?


37 posted on 11/12/2015 11:00:20 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

HOAX


38 posted on 11/12/2015 12:49:23 PM PST by Titus-Maximus (It doesn't matter who votes for whom, it only matters who counts the votes - Joe Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sopater
Poop can smell funny.....

Just saying....

39 posted on 11/12/2015 12:50:20 PM PST by Osage Orange (The liberals are asking us to give Obama time. We agree and think 25 to life would be appropriate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

And he’s Gay...like the POTUS


40 posted on 11/12/2015 12:52:13 PM PST by Osage Orange (The liberals are asking us to give Obama time. We agree and think 25 to life would be appropriate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson