Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drypowder

This isn’t about the Constitution being “abstract” but who the Constitution protects, who it stands against, and who may enforce it.

The ONLY valid federal act is one that is constitutional. NOTHING in the Constitution says the feds are the only ones to say something is or isn’t constitutional. In fact the presumptions of the Constitution along with the Supremacy Clause and the Ninth and Tenth Amendments SUPPORT state nullification of unconstitutional federal acts.

Here, Oregon is going to have to battle this issue out. But the feds have NO constitutional authority to interfere AT ALL.


19 posted on 11/09/2015 9:47:59 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Jim 0216

you made my point


20 posted on 11/09/2015 9:57:41 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Jim 0216
But the feds have NO constitutional authority to interfere AT ALL. One little nit to pick on this: actually, the Federal government is supposed to prevent the states from infringing the rights of the states' residents. There are a number of Supreme Court cases holding this. If the Feds were doing their jobs, they would send SWAT teams to arrest state officials for deprivation of civil rights under color of law, and then burn every gun registry from New York to Illinois.
26 posted on 11/09/2015 10:56:32 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (AMERICA IS DONE! When can we start over?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson