he’s correct. he’s simply pointing out that the fossil record merely proves in-species variation, and that is, by definition, NOT evolution.
Yep. If evolutionists knew nothing about dogs an were presented with a skeleton of a chihuahua and a Great Dane, they would swear that they were different species.
Carson is correct.
I agree.
Exactly. There is a mountain of evidence for adaptation, and literally zero for evolution.
By whose definition?
Interspecific variation DOES arise by the mechanism Darwin postulated. His extension of the principle of natural selection to explain the origin of species, as opposed to interspecific variation, was undoubtedly wrong, but to be fair he could believe in such plasticity of species because he did not know about DNA and the other core elements of species identity.
It's the anti-God zealots who seized on his work to promote their own cause that have made this a mess - not Darwin himself.