Posted on 11/03/2015 12:11:55 PM PST by BlessedBeGod
I can see why. No man would want to have more than one child with this militant hag.
Was she a first child?
"Feminism was created to give unattractive women access to the mainstream."
Lead by example, professor.
If there are too many people, you go first.
The proper response is ‘Who the F____ do you think you are?’. No other response is needed.
Bowdoin College. Home of Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain. Wonder what he would say.
Why one then?
Why not none? Or six? Or any other arbitrary number that fits whatever world view you have?
No college professor can shock me anymore.
http://www.bowdoin.edu/faculty/s/sconly/
Lecturing her fellow Americans on “morality”.
Blow me professor.
If she was really an intellectual she’d do some cursory examination of China’s demographic data and realize what a damned fool she sounds like.
A face not even a mother could love
If life isn’t sacred, then no life is sacred; woman.
Remember that.
Oh, I missed this first time and don’t want you to miss out:
“For this reason, it can be permissible for governments to regulate the number of children we have, as long as they do that in ways that don’t violate rights.”
That’s priceless. heh
https://paw.princeton.edu/issues/2013/05/15/pages/8131/RR-AuthorNew.jpg
Conly argues that more aggressive measures can be justified. A full ban on cigarettes, she says, should be considered.
When to employ coercive measures should be determined on a case-by-case basis, she says. When the good achieved is obvious, and experience suggests education is not enough to persuade individuals to change their behavior, then a more intrusive approach may be necessary.
Conlyâs argument is based on her judgment of human behavior. In the past, philosophers have worked from the assumption that humans are rational beings. Conly began to question this assessment during a break from academic life.
âThe more time I spent out of academics,â she says, âthe more I thought [about] the classical philosophical picture of humans as rational agents who typically see what they want to do and choose the right act in order to reach their ends â [I realized] that picture was just wrong.â
Oftentimes people donât make the right choices, she says, especially when it is not obvious what the long-term impact will be. If you drink a 32-ounce soda, for example, you are not going to die tomorrow; but sustained consumption of high-sugar drinks could lead to severe health problems.
She takes out her teeth, prolly has a flat head for my can of beer. Are you ready for some football?!
I’m an ape man, an ape ape man, I’m a ape man ...
Sez you, professor Hag. Move to China.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.