Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gwgn02

“the M4 makes more sense bejng lighter and shorter with about the same effectice range as its big brother.”

Light and short isn’t very fun during protracted fire. The M4’s light barrel is overwhelmed with heat faster, and becomes inaccurate.
The folding stock also make a good cheekweld tough.
But it looks sexy!

This decision dovetails in neatly with the USMC buying those crappy F-35s also.


19 posted on 11/02/2015 9:23:29 PM PST by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino

0331 supports the m4 role in sustained suppressive fire


27 posted on 11/02/2015 9:43:33 PM PST by gwgn02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson