should have taken both. you can yell at someone and be slapped with domestic violence bs.
if there is no violent crime, denying weapons should not ever enter the equation at all.
Actually, the SCOTUS needs to start working for a living! The should not be able to pick and choose what cases they take. If they're next on the hierarchy of the litigation, they should “have” to take the case. These old coots and cootettes, "wise Latrinas," and JINO Marxists, need to work, resign or be removed from their offices. As it stands, they are being paid too much for "their services."
The fact that many states require licenses for firearms but not for newspaper and other media employees is enough for the court to weigh in regarding the lawfulness of such control. If lawful gun use can be curtailed for unrelated offenses, can we start shutting down so-called reporters for offenses unrelated to their work?