Skip to comments.
Top Saudi Sheikh issues fatwa allowing men to EAT their wives if they are hungry
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/top-saudi-sheikh-issues-bizarre-5491142 ^
Posted on 10/30/2015 3:00:02 PM PDT by LoneCrusader
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: nuconvert
Wow! Westboro Baptist men believe in eating their wives?!?
21
posted on
10/30/2015 3:18:42 PM PDT
by
Jan_Sobieski
(Sanctification)
To: LoneCrusader
This is a family friendly website, so I’ll just ask, did they really need a fatwa to start doing that? Okay, whatever.
To: LoneCrusader
The Southern Pimping Liars Center will blame this on the NRA and the TEA Party.
23
posted on
10/30/2015 3:20:38 PM PDT
by
Rockpile
To: LoneCrusader
A couple of years ago some brain dead cleric issued one of those stupid thing saying that women were an affront to islam and said all women should be killed. This is not religion, it’s a bunch of wackos!
24
posted on
10/30/2015 3:20:47 PM PDT
by
Duckdog
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean people aren't out to get you.)
To: LoneCrusader
I’ve always believed Islam was the “Religion of Pieces” which referred to body parts following actions of a homicide bomber. This gives a whole new meaning to the term...
25
posted on
10/30/2015 3:20:55 PM PDT
by
CedarDave
(Hillary for incarceration not inauguration)
To: LoneCrusader
26
posted on
10/30/2015 3:22:33 PM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: LoneCrusader
"Well, it WAS a fatwa, dear, and I am absolutely famished!"
27
posted on
10/30/2015 3:23:14 PM PDT
by
Heart-Rest
( "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil!" Isaiah 5:20)
To: LoneCrusader
Men in Saudi Arabia "can eat their wives if they are suffering severe hunger" under a bizarre new fatwa reportedly announced by a religious leader in the country. Does the fatwah at least require that the wife be dead first?
28
posted on
10/30/2015 3:27:49 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
To: LoneCrusader
Well that will cut down on those pesky Brazilian trims.
29
posted on
10/30/2015 3:29:17 PM PDT
by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: LoneCrusader
Totally expected from a low IQ savage. If you are dumb enough to follow islam then you are dumb enough to eat people and think it is OK.
30
posted on
10/30/2015 3:38:36 PM PDT
by
CodeToad
(Stupid kills, but not nearly enough!)
To: LoneCrusader
Proof positive the inbreeding and experimentation with goats, sheep and camels have rendered
this element of bi-ped a failed experiment and should be destroyed
I don't care what they LOOK like ... as a man thinketh .... so is he.
31
posted on
10/30/2015 3:42:28 PM PDT
by
knarf
(I say things that are true .... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: Jan_Sobieski
They might. But the point is, they’re nuts too
33
posted on
10/30/2015 3:46:54 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: Jan_Sobieski
On my way home dear.
Slide down the banister and warm up dinner, please.
34
posted on
10/30/2015 3:48:37 PM PDT
by
Hang'emAll
(If guns kill people, do pencils misspell words?)
To: Hang'emAll
35
posted on
10/30/2015 3:49:38 PM PDT
by
sparklite2
(All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
To: Duckdog
Remember that women can’t eat cucumbers or bananas because they look like...well, you know. So, if they can’t prepare a decent breakfast or lunch, what else is the healthy normal male to do but take a bite out of his wife’s arm?
What a sick, sick culture.
36
posted on
10/30/2015 3:59:25 PM PDT
by
miss marmelstein
(Richard the Third: I'd like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
To: LoneCrusader
Paging Hillary, Paging NOW...
To: LoneCrusader
Does ANYONE believe that Islam has a place in the 21st century?
38
posted on
10/30/2015 4:14:57 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(There's a right to gay marriage in the Constitution but there is no right of an unborn baby to life.)
To: Jan_Sobieski
To: LoneCrusader
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson